Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser) (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89655)

Chris is me 20-01-2011 14:58

pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 

ttakashima 20-01-2011 15:00

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
Looks good! How heavy is the frame?

thefro526 20-01-2011 15:28

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
Looks awesome.

I'm curious about weight as well.

Tytus Gerrish 20-01-2011 15:46

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
What diameter wheels?

AdamHeard 20-01-2011 17:18

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
Why internal belts?

Chris is me 20-01-2011 18:11

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
Weight: Honestly have no idea. I didn't do the chassis CAD and when I got a brief look at it today the material properties weren't set. The chassis parts are out of shop now but the second they get back I'll weigh them. It won't be the lightest thing in the world, but we prefer weight down low - with a 9 foot high arm having such a low CG will be immensely helpful.

The wheels are 4" diameter. Gotta love a flat field, right?

The belts are internal for a few reasons. First, internal belt loops are cleaner and less in the way; the less space we take up in the center, the more room we have for things like electronics and our minibot deployment system. Second, they are less "open" so field debris cannot possibly get tangled with them.

As for the drawbacks to internal belts, we saw them and minimized them. Maintenance was a big worry for me, but I'm now convinced it'll be not a problem. We tested these belts rigorously. Rapid speed changes, stalling the motors, mixes of both, and the belts did not skip or strip even once. Also, tensioning is not much of a problem. We have some fairly basic idlers in there for tension and it's a very much "set it and forget it" thing - once you get the belts right you never need to touch them again. Just in case, we did a timed run for a full belt change and it took about 7 minutes. We weren't satisfied, so we added the access window over the middle row, which is where most if not all of the holdup was. It should now be under 5 minutes to change a belt, and we plan on practicing those belt changes.

Akash Rastogi 20-01-2011 18:16

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
Are all the internals from Gates belting? Or did you use something else? Just curious.

Chris is me 20-01-2011 18:22

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi (Post 1004499)
Are all the internals from Gates belting? Or did you use something else? Just curious.

Yup, all Gates. Can't beat the price.

Brandon Holley 21-01-2011 10:57

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1004503)
Yup, all Gates. Can't beat the price.

What pitch/belt width?

-Brando

Dr Theta 21-01-2011 15:26

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
I particularly enjoy seeing this design come to fruition from its initial stages. Ah the design process at work is a beautiful thing.:)

Sh1ine 21-01-2011 23:11

Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandon Holley (Post 1004950)
What pitch/belt width?

-Brando

We are using a 9mm wide 5mm pitch belt.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:30.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi