![]() |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Thanks for the suggestion. In fact, we have already tested this. There is another video that I didn't post that shows the gripper without one simple modification that has made this version SO MUCH better. The "articulating jaw" adds two things: Much better grip on under inflated tubes, and, Tight grip on normally inflated tubes. Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
I think 2007 would've been a better choice for an inside style grabber since all the tubes had the same inner dimensions. |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Now that you mention it, I based that statement on a hunch, which obviously isn't the best choice for decisions making in the engineering world.
Thinking about it a little more now, I can see using an inside grabber that expanded to fill up the middle actually seems like a pretty good idea. If it's a circular shape, then you're guaranteed that the inside edges of the tube will make contact. So I will reserve judgement for now, and best of luck with your design. :) |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
It might work. Is the prototype lighter than the final?::rtm::
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Our current 5th Gear models have 8" tubing in the Square (sides) and Circle, and 6" tubing in the Triangle (sides). Blake |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Yes. The circle and square are a uniform thickness around the central cross-section of the shape (i.e. for the purposes of discussion, if the pieces are lying flat on the floor, the "height" is the same all the way around). The triangle is distinctly different. It is not a simple extruded shape. It is thinner along the edges of the triangle, and thicker ("taller" in the "lying on a flat floor" context) at the corners. When viewed from the side, the inflated triangle has a slight dumbbell shape. The difference in thickness between the middle of the edge and the corner can be as much as two inches. -dave . |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Spinning tubes in a roller claw is a LOT harder if the tubes are drastically different thicknesses. |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
I said "Supposed to be". According to the Manual, there is not supposed to be a difference in the tube diameter between the types. If there is one, the Manual needs to be updated with that information.
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
heh...supposed to be.
We gotta build the robot to work, so we decided to use an inside grabber. The inside of the tubes is roughly the same size, and having a pneumatic actuator with limited force lets the claw grab them all, even if they're quite deflated. Plus it's a lot easier to design and build, and since we have a lot of new young students this year.... |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Triangle Tube shape is a little irregular - Got it - Thanks!
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
We are using an inside gripper and found it easier to pick up tubes. The way ours is designed is that we run into a tube, hit a button and our robot automatically picks up the tube. Also, we found that with an inside gripper we could pick up tubes that have absolutely no air in them (although not by running into them since we would drive over them)
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
I do believe that the Triangle is smaller than the Circle or Square. I will get back to you on this.::rtm::
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi