![]() |
"It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Here are a couple of quick clips or our prototype claw. The final will be much lighter and the action will be faster. The beauty of prototyping it is we found some very interesting mods that really make it work well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMjZ1swhchc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMU7VPON7M4 |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
That's a super nice prototype. Good enough to be the real thing.
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
But there is a little problem. One of our team "rules" is: No wood on the robot!! Some rules are made to be broken.:ahh: |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
That looks awesome actually. Fantastic work by you and your team! Are you planning on making the final version out of aluminum or polycarbonate?
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
she's a looker, thats for sure. For some reason a lot of robots this year look awefully violent...it's awesome.
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
neat prototype!
We have a rule: We make no rules about what materials we can use, the GDC does that for us. Our 2009 robot was made mostly of plywood and plastic pipe, and it was the most effective robot we have made. It even had a couple wood 2x4s in it! Our prototype has two pieces of plywood also, but they work differently. We used a pneumatic, outside, single point grabber in 2007 and were not real pleased with it, even after a redesign between regionals. We're going for the inside grab this year, wish us luck! and when we get it actually grabbing a game piece under computer control, we'll put video up. |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
There were two problems. We did not anticipate how variable the tube inflation would be, and the claw just did not get a good enough grip on tubes that were a bit soft. The second problem was that the tubes could move sideways, they did not want to stay properly oriented.
I think the inside claw will help with both of these problems. This year the goal pegs have a much smaller end cap, so the tube placement action will be different, and more appropriate for an inside grabbing claw. For the original poster, I suggest you have the students try to shake the tube off the claw by moving the "arm" sideways as if it were on the robot, and the robot were maneuvering as robots do in real games. See if you can hold onto the tube, and that the tube does not move around too much. It could be that this design does work just fine. |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
If I recall correctly, both 47 and 33 had "inside grippers," with Chief Delphi using a bucket cut in half as part of their end effector.
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
My big concern with an "inside" grip is lining up the gripper on the tube - that seems a lot harder than driving into a tube and "chomping" it.
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
We didn't have an inside gripper in 2007. It pinched around the side of the tube from the outside.
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Thanks for the suggestion. In fact, we have already tested this. There is another video that I didn't post that shows the gripper without one simple modification that has made this version SO MUCH better. The "articulating jaw" adds two things: Much better grip on under inflated tubes, and, Tight grip on normally inflated tubes. Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
I think 2007 would've been a better choice for an inside style grabber since all the tubes had the same inner dimensions. |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Now that you mention it, I based that statement on a hunch, which obviously isn't the best choice for decisions making in the engineering world.
Thinking about it a little more now, I can see using an inside grabber that expanded to fill up the middle actually seems like a pretty good idea. If it's a circular shape, then you're guaranteed that the inside edges of the tube will make contact. So I will reserve judgement for now, and best of luck with your design. :) |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
It might work. Is the prototype lighter than the final?::rtm::
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Our current 5th Gear models have 8" tubing in the Square (sides) and Circle, and 6" tubing in the Triangle (sides). Blake |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Yes. The circle and square are a uniform thickness around the central cross-section of the shape (i.e. for the purposes of discussion, if the pieces are lying flat on the floor, the "height" is the same all the way around). The triangle is distinctly different. It is not a simple extruded shape. It is thinner along the edges of the triangle, and thicker ("taller" in the "lying on a flat floor" context) at the corners. When viewed from the side, the inflated triangle has a slight dumbbell shape. The difference in thickness between the middle of the edge and the corner can be as much as two inches. -dave . |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Quote:
Spinning tubes in a roller claw is a LOT harder if the tubes are drastically different thicknesses. |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
I said "Supposed to be". According to the Manual, there is not supposed to be a difference in the tube diameter between the types. If there is one, the Manual needs to be updated with that information.
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
heh...supposed to be.
We gotta build the robot to work, so we decided to use an inside grabber. The inside of the tubes is roughly the same size, and having a pneumatic actuator with limited force lets the claw grab them all, even if they're quite deflated. Plus it's a lot easier to design and build, and since we have a lot of new young students this year.... |
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
Triangle Tube shape is a little irregular - Got it - Thanks!
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
We are using an inside gripper and found it easier to pick up tubes. The way ours is designed is that we run into a tube, hit a button and our robot automatically picks up the tube. Also, we found that with an inside gripper we could pick up tubes that have absolutely no air in them (although not by running into them since we would drive over them)
|
Re: "It's the Claaaawww"........ prototype.
I do believe that the Triangle is smaller than the Circle or Square. I will get back to you on this.::rtm::
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi