Re: Team Update #5
 

Let's see if I am thinking what you are thinking.

You use all the power the motors give you, climp up the pole, hit the top burn out the fuse and replace after match and redo next match and so forth?

Cheaper and easier to replace a blown fuse then to have another switch on the bot to bring it back down. The issue I have of placing a switch on the bot to bring it back down the pole is, what if that switch trips or something, then you will not reach the top that match.

Re: Team Update #5
 

The BEST part of this entire update for everyone is

174 1/2 can finally get pimped out now.

Re: Team Update #5
 

Hey, thats a good idea. Thanks.

Re: Team Update #5
 

I was thinking the same thing...

...but we have to be careful that the fuse fries before the motors do, don't we?

That said, playing around with the MINIBOT (and not having yet found that super-optimal gearing), we have found that even somewhat significant weight changes (.5 lbs or so) seem to have almost no effect on the climb rate...

This might well change when we find that 'optimal gearing', of course.

Re: Team Update #5
 

Wouldn't it still not pass initial inspection during the box test? Or is that what they are altering?

Re: Team Update #5
 

Nope, because the smart teams always build smaller than the box to allow for bolt heads. Bolt heads are exempted from the frame perimeter. So it's quite possible to have a bolt head sticking out from the volume defined by the frame perimeter (vertical dimension infinite). Before this ruling, that would have been an issue--it was last year. Now that this update has come out, there is much rejoicing that this doesn't have to happen again.

The box is still the box; no leniency on that for being oversize.

Re: Team Update #5
 

That's good. I thought FIRST was starting to go easy. Who knows maybe the next update would have been "its ok if your .5 lbs overweight?". Now that I understand the difference, an overall good ruling.

Re: Team Update #5
 

Team222badbrad remembers when nobody knew what bumpers where...

"<R14> When a ROBOT is in its STARTING CONFIGURATION, no part of the ROBOT shall extend outside the vertical projection of the FRAME PERIMETER"

Now we don't have to worry about adding lexan and such to our frame to make the bolts flush...

:]

Re: Team Update #5
 

Please also note that the update is allowing the thermal protection wires for the Tetrix motors as listed on the linked Approved Tetrix Parts list.
R92..
A. TETRIX components that are not in violation of any other rules (Tetrix components are listed in Approved Tetrix Parts at www.usfirst.org/frc/competitionmanual),

Re: Team Update #5
 

Woohoo, we can solder the motor leads so they don't come unplugged! There would be many disappointed MINIBOT deployers if they didn't allow this. It was fairly painful in 2009-2010's FTC game.

Re: Team Update #5
 

I'm excited because our base is 1" undersized in any direction, but we have some minor protrusions in the bumper zone, and possibly one or two above, and they weren't specifically addressed prior to this update. I can sleep again. :D

Oh, and I can get rid of the wooden shims.

Re: Team Update #5
 

Why would you ever want to add useless mass to the minibot?

EDIT: I guess some identifying markings wouldn't weigh much.

Re: Team Update #5
 

Yea. A splash of color and team number would be all that is necessary. Having a black box felt so boring.

Re: Team Update #5
 

Additionally, it allows us to powder coat the MINIBOT parts that do not contribute to motion or friction (i.e. anything that doesn't directly make contact with the pole).

Re: Team Update #5
 

Sponsor's logos!