![]() |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
well we were thinking of not using the brick but we didnt want the motors to be at full power so they don,t burn out.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Doug G - Is that Bertrand Russell the amateur rocketeer?
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
So I've had a brainstorm that I'm both anxious and terrified to try out. Those Tetrix motors are expensive after all. All this requires is a standard 4-way light switch and a little faith. For those not in the know, a 4-way light switch takes two inputs and swaps them back and forth. Switch up and A->1, B->2, switch down and A->2, B->1. So, if you have an appropriate drive mechanism, one creatively wired 4-way switch should be all you need to reverse your robot and bring it down at a moderately controlled speed.... Now, stay with me here, cause this is a little crazy.
To get a 4-way switch to reverse your motors, you'd wire battery + and - to the input side, and motor + and - to the output side. Switch up, motor goes one way (up), switch down, motor goes the other (down). Wire both motors to the output, and they both get reversed. Rig this to reverse the motors at the top, and after your minibot's meteoric rise to the target will come a much much more meteoric plummet to the earth. So how about this.... Wire one motor to the 4-way output normally. It gets reversed at the top. For the second motor, wire ONE lead to the correct (upwards) 4-way output. Wire the other motor lead straight to the correct battery lead. When the switch is flipped, this second motor is gets shorted to itself across the switch, causing it to regen brake, thus slowing down the minibot a rather good bit.... I think. But this circuit looks like it might have some... interesting... dynamics, as the second motor is in the return current path of the first motor, which I'm having trouble thinking out properly at the moment. So don't try this at home yet until I work out whether I'm being a little too clever here. To the electricians in the audience, yes, you could hook the second motor up to its own 3-way switch to isolate it from the circuit, but that's a whole extra switch's worth of complication and weight. We're on a strict diet here, man! |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
Just sayin' :] |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
As with other portions of Team Update #6, this Minibot retrieval rule leaves some room for interpretation.
What does everyone think of this: If you actually carried a "retrieval stick" or gaff-like device on your hostbot throughout the match (and subjected it to Robot Inspection with the rest of your machine), would this device actually qualify as "special equipment"??? Or, we could be creative and make a long section of our Bumpers have a hook (also known as attachment hardware) that we could hook our Minibot with to pull it down... If your retrieval stick is part of your Hostbot/Robot (even though without function during the match) could it be considered "special"? Comments welcome but a GDC Q&A might be in order. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
Now that I think about it, would stilts be considered "special equipment" if they were worn by a drive team member during a match? They wouldn't have to be more than a few feet high. I wonder if they would be legal, as unlikely as it would be. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
I was actually working this off general body proportions and some fudging for stretching up and standing on your toes. My mostly guesswork formula comes out as Reach = Height * 11 / 8. I'm 70" and I can reach my 96" ceiling standing on my toes, so all of my data points agree well with my formula....
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
There have been several demonstrations of great performing minibots slowly returning to the base of the tower after reaching the target. Kudos to them. Given Update #6 restriction on using assistive devices to retrieve a minibot is there a team who has figured out how to achieve a slow return willing to share their solution as a way to help possibly hundreds of teams avoid the potential damages likely to happen from free fall situations? For example, many teams designs won't be able to take advantage of a shorting of motor leads to act as a break of sorts because they don't backdrive. I don't see how sharing would give away any potential competitive advantage since it has no effect on the race to the target... and see great advantage to helping a fast minibot that could be potentially be your alliance partner stay intact enough to benefit your team as well...
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi