![]() |
Minibot Falling Solutions
There might be multiple threads of this question, but i would like to make a general one with multiple ideas.
My team today has built a minibot prototype, and it works pretty good. We are running into a problem when the minibot slides down from the top. The minibot moves great upward, but drops like a stone. What are some of your team's ideas on keeping the minibot's downward movement controlled and safe to avoid a hard crash? |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
We were hoping that the motor, being geared, would provide enough resistance to falling. Our main concern, though, is getting the motors to stop because I was trying to see how much torque the motors provided by trying to stop the wheel from spinning. Good news: plenty of torque. Bad news: motor began to smoke after a few seconds.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Try putting memory foam at the bottom of your bot. A nice soft landing.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
Our motor as well has begun to smoke Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Double posting so I don't have to edit a post...
Are these minibots falling/dropping just from the weight of the minibot backdriving the motors? I'll admit I haven't looked to see how fast they backdrive, but falling like a stone doesn't seem likely... If this is the case, however, I vote rigging up a light switch to switch the positive lead on one or both motors from the positive battery lead to the motor's negative lead. Instant regen braking and all that. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
We are planning on using a switch to start the climb, and a switch to make the minibot stop at the top, and then move down slowly. I'm sorry "dropping like a stone" is somewhat an exaggeration, but it just doesn't slide down at a slow, safe pace. What do you think now that memory foam is not allowed? |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
I had an idea: If the robot's arm just so happened to be up at the end of the match, just so happened to be about 10' tall, and just so happened to have a device at a shoulder joint that would allow any claws to be operated by hand without robot power being turned on, I don't think the refs can use the "special equipment" rule to disallow that being used to bring the Minibot down. It's part of the Robot, after all... |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...inibot+warning
It explains a solution for prototyping, but not for the real bot. Surgical tubing or something on the bottom might help. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
c/p from team update #6
<G59> TEAMS must retrieve MINIBOTS from the TOWER quickly and safely without special equipment and while standing on the floor after each MATCH. Violation: The FIELD crew will retrieve the MINIBOT if the TEAM does not. A second violation may result in a YELLOW CARD. so you kind of need the minibot to come back down now or you need some really tall team members. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
What if we buy a really long overcoat and have 3 people stand on each other's shoulders, then they wear the coat. It would appear that it is one person, but it's not.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
Regardless, if the GDC were to outlaw the HOSTBOT from having an attached extension to retrieve the minibot, it would seem rather silly. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
If the MINIBOT is allowed to contact the HOSTBOT again after the TOWER is TRIGGERED, then using the memory foam as a soft landing pad would be a valid idea. But I don't know how <G22> is going to be interpreted.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
lucky for us we have ryan, who is that tall.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
You could always build a bunch of mini-bots then let the field crew rip it down every match. (The sad part is I'm only half joking:rolleyes: ) Has the actual way they plan on getting a stuck mini-bot down been revealed? I'm guessing miniture chainsaw mounted on pole.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
Yeah your thoughts are true. Today was our first time running the minibot on the pole. We are still developing it though. We also were running it on the standard robot battery, rather than the small battery meant to be used on the minibot. We still have to cut some weight and program the minibot, so things might change. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
well if you our using an NXT brick and a motor control you could simply change the speed of your robot to a low power so the minibot will stop where you want it to.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
What do people think about backdriving the motors down the pole?
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
What does work for us, assuming the bot stays up .... is to shake the pole just a little and the thing comes down either backdriving or falling. Either way, its a good thing if we can catch it. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
well we were thinking of not using the brick but we didnt want the motors to be at full power so they don,t burn out.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Doug G - Is that Bertrand Russell the amateur rocketeer?
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
So I've had a brainstorm that I'm both anxious and terrified to try out. Those Tetrix motors are expensive after all. All this requires is a standard 4-way light switch and a little faith. For those not in the know, a 4-way light switch takes two inputs and swaps them back and forth. Switch up and A->1, B->2, switch down and A->2, B->1. So, if you have an appropriate drive mechanism, one creatively wired 4-way switch should be all you need to reverse your robot and bring it down at a moderately controlled speed.... Now, stay with me here, cause this is a little crazy.
To get a 4-way switch to reverse your motors, you'd wire battery + and - to the input side, and motor + and - to the output side. Switch up, motor goes one way (up), switch down, motor goes the other (down). Wire both motors to the output, and they both get reversed. Rig this to reverse the motors at the top, and after your minibot's meteoric rise to the target will come a much much more meteoric plummet to the earth. So how about this.... Wire one motor to the 4-way output normally. It gets reversed at the top. For the second motor, wire ONE lead to the correct (upwards) 4-way output. Wire the other motor lead straight to the correct battery lead. When the switch is flipped, this second motor is gets shorted to itself across the switch, causing it to regen brake, thus slowing down the minibot a rather good bit.... I think. But this circuit looks like it might have some... interesting... dynamics, as the second motor is in the return current path of the first motor, which I'm having trouble thinking out properly at the moment. So don't try this at home yet until I work out whether I'm being a little too clever here. To the electricians in the audience, yes, you could hook the second motor up to its own 3-way switch to isolate it from the circuit, but that's a whole extra switch's worth of complication and weight. We're on a strict diet here, man! |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
Just sayin' :] |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
As with other portions of Team Update #6, this Minibot retrieval rule leaves some room for interpretation.
What does everyone think of this: If you actually carried a "retrieval stick" or gaff-like device on your hostbot throughout the match (and subjected it to Robot Inspection with the rest of your machine), would this device actually qualify as "special equipment"??? Or, we could be creative and make a long section of our Bumpers have a hook (also known as attachment hardware) that we could hook our Minibot with to pull it down... If your retrieval stick is part of your Hostbot/Robot (even though without function during the match) could it be considered "special"? Comments welcome but a GDC Q&A might be in order. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
Now that I think about it, would stilts be considered "special equipment" if they were worn by a drive team member during a match? They wouldn't have to be more than a few feet high. I wonder if they would be legal, as unlikely as it would be. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
I was actually working this off general body proportions and some fudging for stretching up and standing on your toes. My mostly guesswork formula comes out as Reach = Height * 11 / 8. I'm 70" and I can reach my 96" ceiling standing on my toes, so all of my data points agree well with my formula....
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
There have been several demonstrations of great performing minibots slowly returning to the base of the tower after reaching the target. Kudos to them. Given Update #6 restriction on using assistive devices to retrieve a minibot is there a team who has figured out how to achieve a slow return willing to share their solution as a way to help possibly hundreds of teams avoid the potential damages likely to happen from free fall situations? For example, many teams designs won't be able to take advantage of a shorting of motor leads to act as a break of sorts because they don't backdrive. I don't see how sharing would give away any potential competitive advantage since it has no effect on the race to the target... and see great advantage to helping a fast minibot that could be potentially be your alliance partner stay intact enough to benefit your team as well...
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Don't mean to self-quote here, but I had a thought earlier today and put it in the wrong thread.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
well if you cannot get the minibot to slide down slower, than i would suggest putting some kind of cushioning at the bottom of your bot. As for slowing down the fall, maybe tightening the minibot's grip on the pole enough to create more friction but still being able to move up smoothly or some kind of braking mechanism. Hope this helps guys!
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
We are using 2 three-way switches (SPDT) to create an H motor control. We are also using 2 TETRIX on/off switches to start/stop the motors. On our MINIBOT the motors need to turn in the opposite direction but the H motor control reverses both motors. Finally, we are planning on using stainless steel axles to flip the switches and surgical tube to absorb the shock of contact. We are using a latch so the axle does not bounce back and flip the switch again.
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
G59> TEAMS must retrieve MINIBOTS from the TOWER quickly and safely without special equipment and while standing on the floor after each MATCH. Violation: The FIELD crew will retrieve the MINIBO
what is special equpiment? If you made a second minbibot that you would release after the match to retrieve the mini bot at the top. no need to use a long pole if you have a robot to get a robot. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
What is acceptable for a MINIBOT limit switch?
Do you think a DPST plunger type push button switch like: Digikey Part Number: 679-1048-ND would be legal? Would it be legal to activate the MINIBOT with this switch as it is deployed onto the pole? |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
The current Rating is 6 AMPs for this pb switch but I assume that is somewhat comparable to a household light switch. The rules specify max a 20 amp fuse so I would think that would be sufficient for current limiting.
Is there anyway I can get a First judge to respond to this? Also, Is there a detailed list of the Tetrix components on-line? I have failed to find it and I wonder if there is a switch from that list we could use instead. |
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot Falling Solutions
If you are running 2 motors. It is possible to run them at 1/2 voltage (potentially 1/2 speed) by switching them into series connection instead of parallel connection. This cuts the current thru the motors in 1/2.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi