Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: FRC488 Octocanum. (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=90493)

Vikesrock 30-01-2011 14:22

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1011750)
Could you elaborate a bit on that please.. How does making the wheelbase longer accommodate rapid changes in direction?

Rapid direction changes + Short wheel base + tall manipulators = Tipping

The longer the wheel base, the less likely you are to tip when accelerating hard or coming to a hard stop.

Andrew Schreiber 30-01-2011 14:47

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vikesrock (Post 1011764)
Rapid direction changes + Short wheel base + tall manipulators = Tipping

The longer the wheel base, the less likely you are to tip when accelerating hard or coming to a hard stop.

However, mecanum is not at all like full blown swerve. The bot tends to drift a little bit as the rollers spin which should help remove some of the problems typically associated with rapid direction changes and tall manipulators. That being said, I still would not change direction at full speed (or even drop those traction wheels) if I had any sort of large mass up top. But knowing what I know about 488 they will have thought that out already (this ain't their first rodeo with mecanums).

Cool system, glad to see someone went with it, hopefully the ability to strafe will be beneficial.

BJC 30-01-2011 17:37

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
I'm very curious as too why you put the traction wheels on the inside as to opposed to the outside. As of now it appears that you are not really taking full advantage of switching wheel base sizes. Why not put the traction wheels in the longer wheel base configuration to make it that much more difficult to turn as opposed to the mecanum wheels which could be made to preform equally well on the shorter (inner) wheel base?

Otherwise, really cool.

Dad1279 30-01-2011 23:15

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
We prefer to call them über-mecanums..... ;)

dmaldonado 31-01-2011 09:12

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Well team 1708 did a very simalar design

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/34890

Racer26 31-01-2011 09:55

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
I like the idea. If the execution can be made perfectly reliable, it should be a formidable drivetrain. The trick comes in ensuring theres no problems with throwing chains etc.

1708xMr.Roboto 31-01-2011 11:23

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LLogan (Post 1011507)
I have been waiting for somebody to create this.

Looks like you have the best of both worlds. Where are you going to place the piston? I'm having a hard time visualizing where you'll be mounting it.

What configurations are you going to have your wheels in? I.e. four traction only, four mecanum only, 4 traction + 4 mecanum, etc.


Team 1708 actually did something like this last year..

Check it,
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/34890

Madison 31-01-2011 12:25

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BJC (Post 1011892)
I'm very curious as too why you put the traction wheels on the inside as to opposed to the outside. As of now it appears that you are not really taking full advantage of switching wheel base sizes. Why not put the traction wheels in the longer wheel base configuration to make it that much more difficult to turn as opposed to the mecanum wheels which could be made to preform equally well on the shorter (inner) wheel base?

Otherwise, really cool.

We anticipate using the mecanum wheel set most of the time, so we wanted that to be our most stable configuration. The traction wheels are not really intended to prevent others from turning us in place, but to kindly remove defense from our path when the mecanum wheels can't get us around it.

thefro526 31-01-2011 12:33

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Madison (Post 1012434)
<snip> to kindly remove defense from our path when the mecanum wheels can't get us around it.

Well said. Never know when you'll need to gently escort someone across the field.

I really like this drive, I feel like it negates the majority of the disadvantages of a Mecanum Drive in a relatively simple and elegant method.

Ether 31-01-2011 12:38

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Madison (Post 1012434)
We anticipate using the mecanum wheel set most of the time

When you guys assembled those mecs, did you do anything special, like grease the washers at the end of each roller and/or replace the washers with nickel plated ones?



Madison 31-01-2011 12:47

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1012444)
When you guys assembled those mecs, did you do anything special, like grease the washers at the end of each roller and/or replace the washers with nickel plated ones?


We checked that each of the rollers is spinning freely, but did not do anything otherwise special to them. As we run the chassis in, we'll see how they behave and make adjustments as necessary.

JVN 31-01-2011 13:35

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Madison (Post 1011506)

Hi Madison,
Looks good. The Robowranglers built an octocanum platform this fall. Do you mind my asking -- what are you geared at for the mecanum drive?

-John

Madison 31-01-2011 13:39

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JVN (Post 1012484)
Hi Madison,
Looks good. The Robowranglers built an octocanum platform this fall. Do you mind my asking -- what are you geared at for the mecanum drive?

-John

It's geared at 8.9:1 right now.

JVN 31-01-2011 14:13

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Madison (Post 1012489)
It's geared at 8.9:1 right now.

Interesting. That is much faster than I expected.
I look forward to seeing video of it in action so I can recalibrate my mental picture of performance. :)

-John

Madison 31-01-2011 14:15

Re: pic: FRC488 Octocanum.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JVN (Post 1012512)
Interesting. That is much faster than I expected.
I look forward to seeing video of it in action so I can recalibrate my mental picture of performance. :)

-John

I think it's a bit faster than I expected, too. We're going to get a bit more weight onto it soon and test it again under more realistic conditions to get a sense of whether or not it's something we can handle.

We've got rookie drivers this year and haven't found an area large enough to let it run at full speed for more than about a second, so necessity may require that we slow it down.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi