Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Mecanum Einstein this year (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=91401)

gyroscopeRaptor 15-05-2011 12:25

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Out of curiosity, what drive trains did make it to Einstein this year?

O'Sancheski 15-05-2011 12:50

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gyroscopeRaptor (Post 1061561)
Out of curiosity, what drive trains did make it to Einstein this year?

6 and 8WDs

Chris is me 15-05-2011 12:51

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by J_Miles (Post 1061555)
I think that the bad rep that Mecanum wheels have acquired is, in large part, due to their relative lack of experience. Mecanum drive simply has not been around for long enough for a large number of teams to really know how to "do it right." As a result, you see a lot of teams using mecanum wheels that don't execute well.

As of now, mecanum has been around for 6 FRC seasons. I really doubt teams have just not figured it out yet.

Andrew Schreiber 15-05-2011 12:59

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by O'Sancheski (Post 1061567)
6 and 8WDs

And an "H" drive (51).

J_Miles 15-05-2011 13:00

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1061569)
As of now, mecanum has been around for 6 FRC seasons. I really doubt teams have just not figured it out yet.

Still, not a lot of teams have done it well. I don't think, either, that lack of knowhow is the culprit.

Tom Ore 15-05-2011 13:12

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1061569)
As of now, mecanum has been around for 6 FRC seasons. I really doubt teams have just not figured it out yet.

Only 12 teams out of over 2,000 made it to Einstein this year. Lots of quality teams with 6WD and 8WD didn't make it either. A well done drivetrain of any type is just one part of a total robot / program that is required.

Good luck is also required. For example, one could argue that 148 suffered from a qualifying schedule that was too easy. They were third seed because their opponents didn't put up enough points. Had they been first seed, the entire alliance selection on Newton would have gone down differently - but this is nothing more than a bit of bad luck.

Lil' Lavery 15-05-2011 13:14

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawiian Cadder (Post 1061530)
yes, but i knew Galileo. would still win. in past years the championships winner was pre-determined, but barring major failure, i didn't think anyone had much of a chance against the alliance that still won.

Uhh, what? When has the championship winner ever be "pre-determined?"

Didn't everyone think that if 1114 and 469 got together they would win last year? How well did that work out?

And wasn't it supposed to be whoever won Newton in 2006? And wasn't Newton being written off in 07? And wasn't the Archimedes "super division" in 2005 supposed to create the division champion?

Quote:

Originally Posted by J_Miles (Post 1061555)
I think that the bad rep that Mecanum wheels have acquired is, in large part, due to their relative lack of experience. Mecanum drive simply has not been around for long enough for a large number of teams to really know how to "do it right." As a result, you see a lot of teams using mecanum wheels that don't execute well.

Given that AndyMark has been selling the wheels since 2006(?) and other teams, like 357, were making their own even before that, the book is pretty much out on how to do a mecanum drive correctly. The only really recent innovation in the drive has been the new introduction of "octocanums" and "jump drives," which had long been contemplated but never put on the field until recently.

The bad rep that mecanums get is acquired from... physics. High end teams don't like sacrificing ~30% of their power and a good chunk of friction.

Andrew Schreiber 15-05-2011 13:19

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1061575)
The bad rep that mecanums get is acquired from... physics. High end teams don't like sacrificing ~30% of their power and a good chunk of friction.

And weight/precision machining time. Mecanums require 4 gearboxes. 6/8wd requires 2 and even 51's H and 148's (2010) Nonadrive only really need 3.

Ian Curtis 15-05-2011 13:42

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1061575)
The bad rep that mecanums get is acquired from... physics. High end teams don't like sacrificing ~30% of their power and a good chunk of friction.

I think Hawiian Cadder is saying he didn't see much of a chance of beating the eventual champions after alliance selection. We can talk about relative divisional strength all we want, but ultimately it doesn't mean that much until we see which robots from that division actually get together. (And the first seed in Newton in 2006 did a great job preventing powerhouse alliances)


No arguing with that last point though.

XaulZan11 15-05-2011 13:43

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Has anyone compared to the percentage of teams that use mecanum to the percentage of 6/8 wheel drive? I wish I had my scouting notes from the past few years, but I think they would be surprisingly close. Its easy to look at the top teams (111, 217, 148, 1114, 254...) and say that barely anyone uses mecanum drive, but there are a lot of average to below average teams that use mecanum drive every year.

AdamHeard 15-05-2011 13:57

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
The issue with mecanum drives at the high level of play is you are pretty much screwed against a decent defender. The idea of strafing out of the way, or dancing around a team that is actually playing smart defense (which is not what most average teams play in average qualifying matches) is just silly.

If you're the number two scorer on the alliance, it's not a hindrance (or if you're not playinh capable defense), but don't plan on being the top scorer.

Chris is me 15-05-2011 14:20

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ian Curtis (Post 1061582)
I think Hawiian Cadder is saying he didn't see much of a chance of beating the eventual champions after alliance selection.

Do keep in mind though, the semifinals came entirely down to the minibot coin flip in match 1, and the finals were 2v3. While 254 / 111 / 973 was undoubtedly the better alliance, it was certainly not predetermined.

Nemo 15-05-2011 17:19

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
It is true that defense can be tough on a mecanum robot. However, it is an exaggeration to say that mecanum is screwed against good defense.

I'll get one of my students to upload our videos, including the ones against 973. What you will see is a mixture of two things: 1) 973 wasting a good chunk of our time playing good defense, and 2) us getting around them some of the time. This is to be expected. 973 played what I thought was the best defense of any team I watched this year - they were able to stifle not just mecanum opponents but others as well. Yes, it is true that they were not only defending our robot, but that is also to be expected.

It's true that mecanum isn't going to "dance around" or "drive circles around" 6WD defense. But it is not true that mecanum is helpless against defense, either. It's also not true that 6WD is strictly better against defense in every regard. Notably, a mecanum driver can more easily fake out the defender and get them to start in the wrong direction and allow you to rather quickly get past them in the other direction. I'm not saying that works all the time, but it does work some of the time. And yes, mecanum looks pretty bad when the defense is working well and wasting 20 and 30 seconds at a time. Not denying that... I'm just saying that a defender is not able to guarantee this outcome. And do remember that good defense is also capable of wasting 20 and 30 seconds of a 6WD robot's time.

If one wants to argue that 6WD is better against defense than mecanum, then I can agree with that. 6WD is better at hitting the defender on their side near a corner, turning them some, and pushing past, which is a higher percentage play than trying to fake them out.

I don't think it is a liability to have one offensive mecanum robot on an alliance. It does get to be a problem when you have 2 or 3 mecanum robots and you lack a good 6WD to play defense or play some other strategy that requires pushing around. Not having those strategic options available (as 973 did when they switched over to defense after presumably playing offense all season long) is, in my opinion, the bigger downside to mecanum drive.

Daniel_LaFleur 15-05-2011 17:34

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BrendanB (Post 1061525)
I think that eventually we will see one in the next few years. I have seen several teams with mecanums who are programming their robots to give them a competitive edge. Granted there are trade offs but 1503 proved this year that trade offs don't hurt you when done right.

I have seen one mecanum robot from this year that can't be pushed easy and from knowing this team, they will build immensely on what they learned this year!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1061539)
What do you think they did to make it so it couldn't be pushed easily?


If I don't miss my guess, Brendon is talking about the PVC Pirates (1058). They were able to lock the rollers of their Mechanums, basically changing them to a skid steer system, on the fly.

It was, IMHO, very impressive.

Ether 15-05-2011 18:13

Re: Mecanum Einstein this year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur (Post 1061631)
the PVC Pirates (1058)...were able to lock the rollers of their Mechanums, basically changing them to a skid steer system, on the fly.

Did they post any descriptions, pictures, or CAD drawings, do you know?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:46.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi