![]() |
Re: Alamo Regional: Red cards
Quote:
Let us hope the inspectors will communicate such issues with the field. |
Re: Alamo Regional: Red cards
I don't think that you would increase your ranking score so much as piss everyone off if you 'strategized' to go to a match (or skip it entirely) upon missing inspections. Getting an incidental red card would seem probable, but not totally unavoidable. I'd love to see video of 16 & 2056's robot -- based on scores, you guys in Alamo and FLR had a treat!
|
Re: Alamo Regional: Red cards
This happened up at Kettering today, but one match I was human player. I threw a tube, it hit the driver station, and frisbee'd onto our alliance's minibot pole. Our team was confused by this out come because there is nothing in the manual about this. Rule <G24> is the closest I found, but only applies to an opponent's tower.
<G24> The opposing ALLIANCE may not interfere with the DEPLOYMENT or climbing of a MINIBOT. Violation: PENALTY plus RED CARD Interference by an ALLIANCE refers to any action taken by that ALLIANCE that results in disruption of the MINIBOT‟s progress. This may include, but is not limited to, a) throwing a GAME PIECE at the MINIBOT/TOWER, b) driving a ROBOT or GAME PIECE into the TOWER, or c) directly contacting the MINIBOT or TOWER. |
Re: Alamo Regional: Red cards
2056 got a red card at FLR for contacting the tower during end game. It was just a mistake, nothing more, as far as I know.
|
Re: Alamo Regional: Red cards
most of the penalties @ BAE were lane violations and they did pile up, averaging probably about 3 per match
|
Re: Alamo Regional: Red cards
There were VERY few lane violations at FLR. Well, most of them were given penalties, not carded, though most teams knew the rules.
|
Re: Alamo Regional: Red cards
Not too many penalties at NJ, a few yellow and red cards.
A team was playing defense and was pushed into their opponent's zone by an opponent. The defender then collided with a robot trying to hang: Red Card. After that, defenders stayed a lot further from the opponent zone. Probably a dozen lane incursions, mostly inadvertent with no robot-robot contact. Teams learned to avoid tubes in lanes, no matter how attractive. One particularly egregious act was a team that literally rammed an opponent at about the 8 second mark, messing up the minibot deployment. And they would have won regardless... |
Re: Alamo Regional: Red cards
Quote:
Kettering - 2.32105263157895 BAE - 2 New Jersey - 0.561224489795918 Finger Lakes - 2.15948275862069 Traverse City - 1.88659793814433 Average - 1.76997452997367 Nope, apparently NJ teams were the best behaved by a long shot. Wow, I never thought I'd hear myself say that. ;) |
Re: Alamo Regional: Red cards
Or the refs there were the most leniant...
I remember that last year, when we went to Philly, after being at FLR, there were tons of penalties our team noticed that went un called. Three cheers for Dante! |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi