2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

It's that time.
If you could, please post the Alliance Selections from the Regional competitions.

I don't have a 1114 shirt to offer those with multiple posts. ;)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

FLR Regional Alliance Selection Results:
2056, 217, 1518
1126, 340, 3157
191, 229, 3173
145, 1551, 1640
3799, 1511, 174
716, 156, 188
2228, 1153, 639
1559, 3015, 1075

(Cited from Vikesrock :) )

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

New Jersey:

1) 1676 2016 303
2) 423 486 293
3) 1923 25 1860
4) 1228 2590 75
5) 2180 816 1302 (1089 Declined Round 1 pick)
6) 1089 1647 102
7) 2729 1218 192
8) 2191 181 2199

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

BAE/Granite State Regional Alliances:

1) 131, 40, 20
2) 811, 3074, 1058
3) 175, 1519, 176
4) 95, 78, 885
5) 836, 3467, 3323
6) 58, 172, 126
7) 3566, 61, 166
8) 1729, 69, 1073

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Alamo
1)16-148-3481
2)2848-245-57
3)118-2415-2745
4)1429-1477-3545
5)2583-2936-457
6)2789-2587-1296
7)3582-2158-3743
8)3847-2468-647

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Traverse City District:

1 1918-201-141
2 2767-2145-830
3 2000-2474-2771
4 2959-2611-3767
5 66-85-835
6 3688-2246-2619
7 247-74-910
8 3602-3618-2586

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Kettering

1) 33-2137-1
2) 3536-470-1322
3) 3568-894-27
4) 70-1504-1188
5) 302-2337-3535
6) 703-51-2604
7) 494-1243-1684
8) 326-67-3322

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

All week one regionals updated with how each alliance finished.

Week 1

FLR
1) 2056 217 1518 W
2) 3157 1126 340 F
3) 191 229 3173 SF
4) 145 1551 1640 SF
5) 3799 1511 174 QF
6) 716 156 188 QF
7) 2228 1153 639 QF
8) 1559 3015 1075 QF

Alamo
1) 16 148 3481 W
2) 2848 245 57 F
3) 118 2415 2745 SF
4) 1429 1477 3545 QF
5) 2583 2936 457 SF
6) 2789 2587 1296 QF
7) 3582 2158 3743 QF
8) 3847 2468 647 QF

Granite State
1) 131 40 20 F
2) 811 3074 1058 SF
3) 175 1519 176 W
4) 95 78 885 SF
5) 836 3467 3323 QF
6) 58 172 126 QF
7) 3566 61 166 QF
8) 1729 69 1073 QF

New Jersey
1) 1676 2016 303 W
2) 423 486 293 QF
3) 1923 25 1860 QF
4) 1228 2590 75 QF
5) 2180 816 1302 SF
6) 1089 1647 102 F
7) 2729 1218 192 SF
8) 2191 181 2199 QF

Traverse City
1) 1918 201 141 W
2) 2767 2145 830 F
3) 2000 2474 2771 QF
4) 2959 2611 3767 QF
5) 66 85 835 SF
6) 3688 2246 2619 SF
7) 247 74 910 QF
8) 3602 3618 2586 QF

Kettering
1) 33 2137 1 W
2) 3536 470 1322 QF
3) 3568 894 27 QF
4) 70 1504 1188 QF
5) 302 2337 3535 SF
6) 703 51 2604 SF
7) 494 1243 1684 F
8) 326 67 3322 QF

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Nice wrap-up on Week 1, David!

Thanks to everyone for contributing... til next week.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Is there value in recording the seeding orders? The top eight might have picked alliance partners from the top too, so the starting order of the round might be significant. i was reminded of this at the FTC alliance selection I saw yesterday.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

The initial seeding order is accessible in the data available from FIRST. The order teams were picked in is not, hence the need to record it if people want access to it.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Although I feel like a talkshow host for quoting myself, let me refer you to my post.


One tip-off, which should be pretty clear to anybody who was watching the event, is that 27 and 703 were both far too good not to make the first round of picks.

I do realize that you're probably just quoting what you've heard, so no worries. :)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I do believe your own quote has 27 being the 3rd alliance's 1st pick.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Yes, this is correct. 33 seeded first and picked second seed 2137. Third seed 3536 got the next pick and took 1322. Then, 894 picked 27. No teams declined to be picked during the entire process.

If you're a little confused by who got which seed (which is understandable considering that 302 is displayed as having played 11 matches, while everybody else is at 12) you can refer to the official page.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Respectfully offered by team #3536 as the reasoning behind our pick. We were humbled to be competing with the likes of Rush 27. We had considered them very closely. Our team voted to unannamously to invite team #1322 with a first round pick.

We felt strongly that it was the least we could do in recognition of that teams support. They were there for us many times during a very tough build season.

We believed strongly that if we were not given the honor to be asked by either the Killer Bees or Torq in which we would have humbly accepted.

As a rookie team we should remain Gracious and honor the team that had been instramental in getting us to the event.

We are small but mighty.....In a forest of Giants. We will earn our dues!

All of the competitors there were awesome to us. We hope to earn all of your teams respect because you all truely have ours.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Our team was considing picking 3536 as one of our partners, but us dropping down to 7th seed then up to 5th seed didnt allow that seeing as u guys were second. I was very impressed by what you guys did and have seen that you guys stayed with what you guys had said at the one strategy meeting that i cant seem to remember where it was held

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Thanks Brian,

302 was on our list as well, picking was a huge stress for us. We are going to Waterford and scout to practice the scouting picking cycle. As rookies we watched matches closely for matching play strategy. But the end game of alliance picking was serious chess play that we want to practice. We want to learn and be better prepared for alliance if we are fortunate to be anywhere close to that again.

We hope 302 would still consider us if it ever comes up again. We look forward to the next time we meet either together or against. By the way 3536 saw you at Baker College Strategy meeting. Thanks for acknowledging what we said at Baker. Not everyone there agreed with our strategy if you remember. It was hard to hear some of the comments that challenged it. We went back and scrubbed the game play to rationalize the criticism. It was hard but we decided to stick with what we said were going to do.

We feel stongly that we are a team that stands by our words.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

If that strategy was to focus on a consistent minibot rather than a manipulator, I would say you were rather justified. 2nd Alliance Captain as a rookie is not too bad at all:) .

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Thanks Norman.

The Bees are pretty incredible. To hear from your team on our behalf is an honor! We really respect what you guys do!! Those bots you brought are true cool no doubt.

Tell Jim "the Ninja" we took his advice and have a kid are tossing tubes everyday now. We will be ready if we get another chance to play the role with you guys again.

Yes we said strong agile Defensive bot with a Minibot. Having a good time playing the role. Good luck next round to all on the bees.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

My apologies, updates for Kettering were extremely sporadic, with the final qualification results not even posted until after the competition was over. I mainly made sure teams were listed on the right alliances but highly doubted 27 was actually a 3rd round pick.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

It looks like FIM's website now has posted its own list of alliance picks for Kettering and TC. From my cursory glance, it seems to line up with what's been posted here already.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Florida

1. 179, 233, 108
2. 386, 341, 3376
3. 1649, 1065, 79
4. 103, 86, 945
5. 801, 1592, 744
6. 3149, 1902, 180
7. 1027, 1557, 2425
8. 1523, 1251, 21

*801 declined 1649

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Pittsburgh
1) 1114, 1503, 3492
2) 1507, 48, 1541
3) 772, 63, 2252
4) 2614, 1038, 3193
5) 337, 291, 3504
6) 1319, 3138, 1629
7) 378, 128, 3511
8) 3260, 1533, 2603

I didn't catch if there were any declines...

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

WPI
358, 190, 2437 (*177 and 40 both declined a first round draft request)
177, 3125, 1100
3280, 236, 2168
40, 195, 2370
121, 230, 3044
228, 2067, 839
1772, 1884, 3205
571, 1735, 2648

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

No one got Duluth? They drafted 15+ min ago I think
KC
1. 525 1730 1984
2. 967 1985 2996
3. 476 935 1806
4. 1986 1982 2373
5. 1810 1710 3528
6. 1939 3284 1825
7. 2874 662 932
8. 2410 2345 1098

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Waterford:

1) 573 - 3098 - 3770 SF
2) 2612 - 2834 - 3414 F
3) 1596 - 2246 - 3604 SF
4) 3707 - 3542 - 3401 QF
5) 3539 - 548 - 3620 W
6) 3234 - 3638 - 862 QF
7) 3771 - 3547 - 68 QF
8) 3538 - 226 - 2851 QF

No declines

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Wisconsin
111, 2826, 2702
2202, 1732, 537
1625, 234, 93
2062, 1714, 930
269, 868, 171
135, 2481, 2041
1716, 3362, 2022
2077, 706, 1675

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Lake Superior - Duluth

1 876 2512 3747
2 2169 2530 3275
3 877 2518 3840
4 1816 2418 2052
5 2177 2538 2500
6 2574 2503 3294
7 3054 3297 3839
8 3056 2227 2499

1-4 went to semis
1-2 in finals
#1 wins in 3 matches, 4 if you count second match which was replayed due to field scoring problems

2169 won chairmans third yr in a row

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

BTW, the Peachtree regional is held in Duluth, Georgia. Food for thought when referring to either Peachtree or Lake Superior.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I was confused when Brian referred to Duluth before and I was thinking Georgia wasn't this week.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Oh ya that is right, sorry for the confusion. I am struggling for what to call this new regional. Since I generate OPRs for all regionals I am most familiar with the 3 or 2 letter FIRST abbreviation for and often default to it. Lake Superior is DMN since it is held in Duluth, MN. This is why when I was trying to record Waterford quickly after the selection, I called it OC1. I know OC is for Oakland County, but why 1 :confused: All other abbreviations use 2 (mn, on, wa). Is it because it is not held on the same week as OC (Troy)?

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

NEW YORK CITY REGIONAL

1. 395, 359, 527
2. 335, 1230, 2809
3. 3419, 2344, 2265
4. 1989, 1279, 2070
5. 1626, 870, 555
6. 369, 354, 3742
7. 2601, 694, 41
8. 263, 272, 3059

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

New York:

1.) 395 359 527
2.) 335 1230 2809
3.) 3419 2344 2265
4.) 1989 1279 2070
5.) 1626 870 555
6.) 369 354 3742
7.) 2601 694 41
8.) 263 272 3059

There were no declines.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

West Michigan:

1.) 2054 67 107
2.) 1918 27 3357
3.) 226 74 3452
4.) 2767 1718 3570
5.) 3234 2000 904
6.) 3875 3603 3658
7.) 857 1711 3572
8.) 141 85 2474

2153 would have been the 8th alliance captain, but they took themselves out of the tournament because they were having difficulties with their robot or something... (?)

There were no declines.

2054 had an incredible showing so far this weekend, going undefeated in 12 qualification matches and tying the all-time high score of 135. Move over, <insert powerhouse here>... here come the TECH Vikes!

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Bayou:

Capt Pick1 Pick2 Finish
1: 456 125 3616
2: 364 1927 3337
3: 34 2992 3606
4: 2190 2242 2078
5: 3753 1912 3672
6: 1421 3411 3039
7: 3228 116 2183
8: 3468 2080 348

*3469 declined to the #8 alliance because their robot wasn't working

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Detroit

1. 217, 51, 3096
2. 245, 469, 2832
3. 1023, 201, 3115
4. 903, 123, 1502
5. 3547, 308, 440
6. 1701, 503, 515
7. 818, 1025, 1
8. 280, 815, 1250

All invitations were accepted; no team declined.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Their reason for leaving was that they had a long trek home to the UP, and could not stay for elims.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Detroit District Competition

1) 217 - 51 - 3096
2) 245 - 469 - 2832
3) 1023 - 201 - 3115
4) 903 - 123 - 1502
5) 3547 - 308 - 440
6) 1701 - 503 - 515
7) 818 - 1025 - 1
8) 280 - 815 - 1250

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Israel regional:

1. 2230 1657 3388
2. 1574 1690 3351 winners!
3. 1662 1957 3075
4. 3339 3083 1578
5. 1937 2630 1942
6. 3034 1577 3316
7. 3211 2679 2212
8. 1954 2213 1955

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Seattle Olympic Regional:

1) 3238, 1425, 2147
2) 3393, 2990, 1899
3) 1294, 2907, 3220
4) 2605, 473, 2555
5) 2922, 2046, 1595
6) 1332, 192, 3663
7) 3787, 3070, 2412
8) 3223, 753, 751

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Seattle Cascade

1. 2471 1510 2660
2. 360 2928 3662 (1983 declined)
3. 2122 488 2850
4. 2930 2557 3221
5. 1983 3681 3219
6. 3574 948 2980
7. 3049 115 1318
8. 3825 2910 1778

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I don't think this has already been posted:

Peachtree (GA)
1. 2415-1771-2815
2. 3149-1261-1648
3. 3265-1999-1414
4. 1683-3224-832
5. 2420-122-3573
6. 2967-2665-1848
7. 2974-3344-1127
8. 1795-590-1311

There were no teams declining, and no backup bots needed, although I did hear that the 4th potential backup bot (1788???) decided to give that spot to the next highest team, and leave early.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Chesapeake Regional

1) 714 - 836 - 237 (F)
2) 768 - 1218 - 1699 (W)
3) 1124 - 1111 - 484 (Q)
4) 340 - 1403 - 88 (S)
5) 365 - 2199 - 2377 (Q)
6) 250 - 1143 - 134 (S)
7) 1895 - 888 - 549 (Q)
8) 2912 - 846 - 2537 (Q)

Team 714 has two first round picks decline (365 and I believe 340).

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

BMR:

1) 2081 - 234 - 2040 W
2) 1501 - 292 - 451 F
3) 3176 - 1018 - 3186 SF
4) 1741 - 829 - 1720 SF
5) 538 - 1646 - 3559 QF
6) 2867 - 1024 - 3487 QF
7) 3865 - 868 - 461 QF
8) 447 - 1756 - 554 QF

No declines, no backup robots used

2081 went through the entire event undefeated.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Fixed above with bold. I am pretty sure 340 declined Alliance #2, (if not it was Alliance #3 not Alliance #1)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

St. Louis Regional --

1) 1985, 3284, 3397 (W)
2) 931, 1706, 3858 (F)
3) 1329, 1098, 3868 (S)
4) 1094, 1182, 1723 (S)
5) 3519, 2978, 1288 (Q)
6) 1658, 2893, 3686 (Q)
7) 2838, 1444, 1178 (Q)
8) 3792, 1208, 2408 (Q)

No declines.

Q1, Q4, and S1 went in straight matches.

Q2, Q3, and S2 went to rubber matches.

Finals: 95-46, 95-45. 1985 and 3284 have quick, reliable minibots.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Updating Seattle Olympic Regional:

1) 3238, 1425, 2147 (F)
2) 3393, 2990, 1899 (W)
3) 1294, 2907, 3220 (S)
4) 2605, 473, 2555 (S)
5) 2922, 2046, 1595 (Q)
6) 1332, 192, 3663 (Q)
7) 3787, 3070, 2412 (Q)
8) 3223, 753, 751 (Q)

No declines.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Updated with results

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Updating Seattle Cascade Regional

1. 2471 1510 2660 (W)
2. 360 2928 3662* (S)
3. 2122 488 2850 (F)
4. 2930 2557 3221 (Q)
5. 1983 3681 3219 (S)
6. 3574 948 2980 (Q)
7. 3049 115 1318 (Q)
8. 3825 2910 1778 (Q)

*1983 and 2122 Declined

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Updating Peachtree to include W,F,S,Q results:

Peachtree (GA)
1. 2415-1771-2815 W
2. 3149-1261-1648 F
3. 3265-1999-1414 Q
4. 1683-3224- 832 Q
5. 2420- 122-3573 S
6. 2967-2665-1848 S
7. 2974-3344-1127 Q
8. 1795- 590-1311 Q

No declines, no backups needed.

Before selection, 1771 was ranked #3, 1261 was ranked #4.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Waterloo Regional Alliance Selections

1. 1114 2056 3756 (W)
2. 1310 610 3396 (F) *781 declined 1st pick
3. 781 3683 2625 (S)
4. 2702 1075 1334 (S)
5. 2361 3161 843 (Q)
6. 1241 2200 1535 (Q)
7. 288 1305 907 (Q)
8. 244 1312 2609 (Q)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Washington DC:
1. 768, 233*, 2377
2. 623, 2534, 1418
3. 2016, 63, 1708
4. 2590, 378, 1511
5. 449, 1279, 56
6. 2077, 190, 945
7. 1089, 1598, 116
8. 293, 578, 346

* 2016 declined first overall pick

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Niles
1. 2771 74 2591
2. 2054 2474 858
3. 1941 2959 503
4. 3357 904 3658
5. 3572 1677 3509
6. 3620 1243 1506
7. 3875 141 3640
8. 2612 3546 1528

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Palmetto:
1 180-2363-2815 W
2 2614-11-1293 S
3 343-2751-1287 F
4 900-1319-2483 Q
5 1875-281-1902 S
6 1539-339-1311 Q
7 744-95-1251 Q
8 3196-1102-1051 Q

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

These are the alliances from the FIRST site, I'm not 100 % certain of the pick order since the webcast was down. The pick orders represent a best guess when I couldn't logic it out. If anyone catches a mistake let me know and I'll edit.

MIDWEST

1. 111 118 3494
2. 1987 16 3067
3. 1625 2826 1367
4. 1732 71 45
5. 2949 135 101
6. 2338 2410 2022
7. 2194 2358 1091
8. 1675 2171 2410

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Los Angeles

330-1717-1515
1197-968-3473
599-973-207
3512-980-702
294-399-2339
2496-696-589
2619-2272-1138
848-691-687

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

No L.A. declines, backups available are 3851, 2637, 981, 597.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Hawaii

359-368-3880
2499-1056-3882
2090-2438-3837
2504-2445-2443
3685-2348-2477
2467-2853-3132
3721-2437-3881
3306-2460-2455

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Oregon:
1 2046-1983-3663 Q
2 1510-1540-847 S
3 2733-1425-2087 F
4 2471-360-3711 W
5 2605-1318-2130 Q
6 3070-2990-753 Q
7 2517-2811-2928 Q
8 488-956-2557 S

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Long Island
1 1626-229-375 W
2 28-870-270 Q
3 263-547-1546 Q
4 522-3137-1468 S
5 1796-329-810 Q
6 358-884-1358 S
7 271-287-564 F
8 1168-545-1203 Q

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Updating with results:

Los Angeles

330-1717-1515 (F) 3851 called in for finals as backup
1197-968-3473 (W)
599-973-207 (S)
3512-980-702 (Q)
294-399-2339 (S)
2496-696-589 (Q)
2619-2272-1138 (Q)
848-691-687 (Q)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Updated

1. 111 118 3494 W
2. 1987 16 3067 S
3. 1625 2826 1367 F
4. 1732 71 45 S
5. 2949 135 101 Q
6. 2338 2410 2022 Q
7. 2194 2358 1091 Q
8. 1675 2171 2410 Q

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Niles District --

1) 2771, 74, 2591 (F)
2) 2054, 2474, 858 (W)
3) 1941, 2959, 503 (S)
4) 3357, 904, 3656 (S)
5) 3572, 1677, 3509 (Q)
6) 3620, 1243, 1506 (Q)
7) 3875, 141, 3640, 3688 (Q)
8) 2612, 3546, 1528 (Q)

Note1: 2054 seeded 2 and declined invitation from 2771. 74 seeded 3 and accepted.

Note2: 2767 seeded 14 and became #8 AC, but declined to form an alliance, so 15 seed 2612 became #8 AC.

Note3: #1 backup 3688 joined Alliance 7 when 3640 robot was not functional before their first elimination match.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

3197 played for our 3rd bot in the finals due to our 3rd bot breaking.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Israel regional:

1. 2230 1657 3388 (F)
2. 1574 1690 3351 (W)
3. 1662 1957 3075 *1937 refuse (QF)
4. 3339 3083 1578 (SM)
5. 1937 2630 1942 (QF)
6. 3034 3316 1577 (SF)
7. 3211 2679 2212 (QF)
8. 1954 1955 2213 (QF)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Ann Arbor did not appear to be posted yesterday, so here goes:

1. 2337 494 66 (Winner)
2. 3098 548 247 (F)
3. 2619 573 3548 (SF)
4. 70 302 1025 (SF) backup: 3638
5. 3547 68 835 (QF)
6. 3536 2145 2075 (QF)
7. 3535 1322 1504 (QF)
8. 3322 830 1684 (QF)

The fourth alliance lost 1025 after semifinals match one. 3638 replaced.

QF:
1 over 8
4 over 5
2 over 7
3 over 6

SF:
1 over 4
2 over 7

F:
1 over 2 (3 matches, all with higher point totals from 1, but 1 got red carded first match)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

updating for results

1. 768, 233, 2377- W
2. 623, 2534, 1418 - QF
3. 2016, 63, 1708, 1885- F (1885 was a replacement for 1708)
4. 2590, 378, 1511- SF
5. 449, 1279, 56- QF
6. 2077, 190, 945- QF
7. 1089, 1598, 116-SF
8. 293, 578, 346- QF

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

San Diego

1. 254, 987, 3704 (W)
2. 2485, 1538, 687 (Q)
3. 589, 2090, 812 (S)
4. 3255, 1160, 599 (Q)
5. 3477, 1717, 2102 (S)
6. 973, 968, 980 (Q)
7. 1540, 399, 2439, 294* (F)
8. 2984, 1572, 1622 (Q)

*brought on as backup in finals match 2

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Smoky Mountain:

1.) 71 48 2974
2.) 801 234 1747
3.) 1741 1519 451
4.) 547 931 34
5.) 337 1208 379
6.) 1592* 1024 829
7.) 2918 1421 1249
8.) 79 3824 1261

1592 declined the fourth pick from 547.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

GTR West
1) 2056-781-1547
2) 1334-610-1325
3) 2852-1310-771
4) 1305-2809-3541
5) 3590-772-3382
6) 2386-3664-1221
7) 3543-3571-1219
8) 3161-3710-2634


GTR East
1) 1114-1503-1482
2) 188-1075-1006
3) 1241-3117-2626
4) 1404-3360-3705
5) 1815-907-2625
6) 3698-2200-1514
7) 2609-1246-467
8) 3544-919-3530

*2670 pulled out of #7 captain due to a broken robot

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

CT Regional

Top 8 seeds:
1. 1923
2. 177
3. 195
4. 69
5. 716
6. 230
7. 175
8. 1124
9. 1071
10. 383
11. 694
12. 2067

Alliances:
1. 1923 195 155
2. 177 175 1073
3. 69 230 1027
4. 716 181 3125
5. 1124 176 714
6. 1071 558 237
7. 383 694 20
8. 2067 2168 126

Team 195 was the 3 seed and was picked into the first seed alliance. Team 175 was the 7th seed and was picked by the second alliance. Team 230 was the 6th seed and was picked by the 3rd seed alliance. Teams 1071, 383, and 694 moved into the 6-8 alliance spots and then team 383 picked 694 which moved 2067 up to the 8th picking spot. There were no declines.

Not going to lie, after 177 picked 175, I was really hoping that everyone else would somehow forget to pick 176 so that 175, 176, and 177 could pair up. Because it would amuse me.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Troy:

1.) 2337 469* 3548
2.) 217 33 3450
3.) 3539 1718 2586
4.) 245 226 244
5.) 910 68 3115
6.) 3302 703 288
7.) 503 1188 2851
8.) 322 2604 903

*217 declined the 1st pick.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

So why does 469 get the asterisk?

Also, re: your earlier post (Smoky Mountain Regional) -- 1592 declined the 4th pick from 547.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I don't know why 469 got the asterisk. Also, I'm sorry for missing that decline. I could have missed some declines at North Star too; sorry about that.

Livonia:

1.) 1023 2137 3617
2.) 1528 3542 1941
3.) 1250 326 818
4.) 3773 2620 240
5.) 308 280 123
6.) 2611 2676 3401
7.) 313 3656 3414
8.) 2832 3641 3602

308 declined 3773, 313 declined 2611, and 2612 declined the #8 pick of 2832 and thus removed themselves from the tournament.

North Star:

1.) 2512 1730 2225
2.) 171 1939 648
3.) 537 3130 3293
4.) 2175 1816 1652
5.) 3290 2491 3691
6.) 3690 2506 2472
7.) 3278 2177 2549
8.) 3026 2220 3042

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I hope they knew what was going on....

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

10,000 Lakes Regional

1. 525, 967, 3642
2. 2705, 2169, 3765
3. 3082, 141, 3276
4. 2062, 2232, 2545
5. 2518, 1714, 3630
6. 2511, 93, 1806
7. 3883, 3018, 2450
8. 2957, 2052, 2498

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I hope so too... 2612 is a good team, making finals at Waterford this year and putting up a good fight in the QFs at Niles. Last year they were finalists at Cass Tech and MSC and were eliminated by 469 at every single event they attended.

Perhaps, since they already went to two districts, they wanted to give other teams a chance to get points for MSC... or maybe there was something wrong with their robot.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Quoting myself to update that the 5th seed alliance had to ask for a backup for 176 after the first quarterfinal and therefore 1699 is now a member of that alliance.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

*Declined 3rd overall pick from 537 :rolleyes:

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

SVR has the most messed up alliance selections I have ever seen.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Agreed. Declining to be alliance captains...? And like 4 declines.

1) 254 1538 751
2) 1323 1868 604
3) 2141* 256 701
4) 670** 846 1351
5) 971 295 1622
6) 2473 192 1280
7) 2159*** 100 766
8) 2456 2035 675

*2141 declined by 670, 971
**670 tries to invite 971, in violation of alliance selection rules
***2159 tries to decline alliance captain position, has a "change of heart," tries to pick 2456, declined, chooses 100 instead.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Anyone know why he declined to be captain? Or why everyone declined to #3? Was it just lack of preparation, or was it something about their robot?

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

This year's SVR seemed messed up in general. Some historically great teams were ranked near the bottom, while some newer teams took higher rankings (congrats to them!). Some things never change, though; the Poofs are, as usual, undefeated. :cool:

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I heard a "we broke" in the webcast. #3 was declined because they arguably were carried into that seed. 971 declined because they were performing at a level this morning where they should have been selected by 1323. Since that didn't happen, they chose to make their own alliance.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

The alliance selections at Seattle Cascade were even more messed up... lots of teams didn't know the rules, and one team even tried to invite themselves.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Poor girl, she was just a rookie, and she had no idea what was going on. She had gotten her short list of teams to pick from another team, and the other team had accidentally forgotten to remove her teams name from the list. So she just went right on down the list....
I really hope the laughter doesnt color her opinion of FIRST for the worse after this.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

As a note, 971 declined before being notified of the alliance selection rules. Just one more thing to convolute this selection even more!

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

SVR selections were pretty laughable. It would have been interesting to see 1323 and 971 against 254 and 1538. I think they at least could give the poofs a better challenge.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Hey, don't mock the Sacramento Regional champs! 1323+1868+604 could give the Poofs a challenge, too. ;)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Not mocking, only saying there was the possibility for a stronger alliance...

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Silicon Valley Regional
1) 254 1538 751 W
2) 1323 1868 604 F
3) 2141 256 701 Q
4) 670 846 1351 Q
5) 971 295 1622 S
6) 2473 192 1280 S
7) 2159 100 766 Q
8) 2456 2035 675 Q
Updated for results

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I have to agree. 254+971 would probably blow everyone out of the water. But considering 971 lost three of their qualification matches, the real #2 alliance wasn't a bad one, either.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I was actually talking about 1323 and 971 together but I think by the end of qualifications 971 was playing like the second best robot at the event. They were definitely shaky early on but that's to be expected with the first regional.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

I'm sorry - yes, you were referring to 1323 and 971. But, my original point was that none of the SVR selections were "laughable." Sure, some may make you (and I) question the captains' intentions, but, in the end, they were all strong alliances. I was surprised that some teams made a comeback and performed well in the QF/SF.

(I think our posts belong on the SVR thread; we're hijacking this one. Apologies to those who are reading this but have come here for actually useful info.)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Not to offend, but please do realize that in the very first match of the Silicon Valley Regional 971 was up against 254.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Las Vegas:
1 2984-987-60 (W)
2 1572-359-2496 (F)
3 3009-1197-1158 (S)
4 3019-1485-2403 (Q)
5 2637-1726-166 (S)
6 2429-1631-2102 (Q)
7 3155-4-991 (Q)
8 3128-1703-1011 (Q)

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Updating:



1726 swapped for 2057 for semis. No declines.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

This is exactly what happened. I talked to 2612 after the selections and they said that they wanted to give other teams a chance to gain points because they already had enough. It was an extremely gracious move on their part and should be commended.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

Team 1528 has worked a lot with 2612 at this event. Even when we were the 3rd seed, they told us that they were not going to participate in the eliminations because they didn't feel right taking points away from others. I thaught this was very nice of them and I was extremely disappointed to hear that they were boo'd for this.

This is a perfect example of why you should not judge someone before you know their story. I give great respect to 2612 (WMD) for them not worry about getting trophies and allowing others to get much needed points. I wish others would look at them and follow in their footsteps when they go to their third event.

Re: 2011 Alliance Selection Results
 

1323 knew that their strength was in tube scoring and was looking for a 1st pick with a consistently strong minibot. I'll be the first to admit that 971 is a better hanger than us (although expect that gap to be closed by Championships) but our minibot was probably the 2nd or 3rd at the competition (up there with 2456 and 254).

And I think we gave the Poofs a run for their money.... Especially because they were not expecting our defensive strategy. Their scout captain sent me a text saying "What are you doing?" in the middle of the first match because they were expecting something completely different and it took them a while to respond.