Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   breaking the minibot/ controled descent (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93984)

ADTRavenger3585 24-03-2011 17:47

breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
what is the best way to safely stop the minibot at the top of the pole or put it in a controled descent. please give me a good explanation. danke.
-ethan and 3585

Andrew Bates 24-03-2011 18:43

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
See this thread http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=93876

Duke461 24-03-2011 18:46

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
Most methods involve increasing friction on the poles greatly. That can be done when the normal force on the pole by the wheels is greater. However, when doing that it usually makes it slower. Not saying the normal force and friction is completely bad, but theres a fine line.
In all honesty, your minibot should be fine if it falls back down.
If your're really concerned, put foam or some cushioning support on your deployer so that when it comes back down it softly lands into that.
Hope This Helps,
-Duke

Daniel_LaFleur 24-03-2011 19:57

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ADTRavenger3585 (Post 1044805)
what is the best way to safely stop the minibot at the top of the pole or put it in a controled descent. please give me a good explanation. danke.
-ethan and 3585

The best way, we found, for a controlled descent, is to make the motor act as a brake on the way down.

To do this you need to connect the positive pole of the battery to both electrical connections of the motor, during descent. Use a light switch that gets switched when the minibot hits the top to do this.

Basically, have the lightswitch change the connections on the motor from + and - to + and +.

fox46 25-03-2011 07:22

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
Actually, it has nothing to do with connecting the motor to (+) but rather, shorting the leads to the motor so that as it backdrives down the pole it acts as a generator. With the dead short on the "generator output" it resists rotation.

TEE 25-03-2011 20:20

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
haha, the title of this thread confused me at first... you said "breaking" instead of "braking" :rolleyes:

tdramble 25-03-2011 21:38

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
We implemented a circuit that switched the motors from driven to "braking" via a short when it reaches the top, here is a video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEXraq_Tmy0

ROBOTS! 25-03-2011 22:07

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Duke461 (Post 1044826)
In all honesty, your minibot should be fine if it falls back down.

we broke 3 gearboxes on our minibot from it hitting the bottom when it came back down. A little surgical tubing as padding works nicely!

Mr V 25-03-2011 23:33

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fox46 (Post 1044996)
Actually, it has nothing to do with connecting the motor to (+) but rather, shorting the leads to the motor so that as it backdrives down the pole it acts as a generator. With the dead short on the "generator output" it resists rotation.

Correct it is turning the motor into a generator that creates the dynamic braking effect.


Most teams short it via the (-) side of the circuit rather than the (+) side, though both ways will do the same thing.

Daniel_LaFleur 26-03-2011 18:08

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr V (Post 1045222)
Correct it is turning the motor into a generator that creates the dynamic braking effect.


Most teams short it via the (-) side of the circuit rather than the (+) side, though both ways will do the same thing.

My understanding (and I may be wrong, it's been a while since I'ce studies regenerative braking) was that connecting the (-) sides together dissipated the energy as heat in the motor while connecting the (+) to both sides would dissipate the energy by recharging the battery. Am I incorrect in this? and if I'm not wouldn't it be better not to heat an already heated motor?

Vikesrock 26-03-2011 19:28

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur (Post 1045400)
My understanding (and I may be wrong, it's been a while since I'ce studies regenerative braking) was that connecting the (-) sides together dissipated the energy as heat in the motor while connecting the (+) to both sides would dissipate the energy by recharging the battery. Am I incorrect in this? and if I'm not wouldn't it be better not to heat an already heated motor?

Regardless of which side you connect, the battery is not part of the completed circuit and thus no current flows in or out of it. All energy dissipation occurs in the motor and the wiring/components that are shorting the leads.

Al Skierkiewicz 28-03-2011 08:42

Re: breaking the minibot/ controled descent
 
Daniel,
By shorting the motor leads together, you cause all generated currents to flow in the short and no where else. It does not matter whether the the positive or negative lead of the battery is connected at all. No current will flow through the battery when the motor leads are shorted. This method is identical to the the "brake" mode on either the Victor or Jag. The amount of current generated and the amount of braking action is RPM dependent. The faster the motor is spinning the more braking is evident.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi