![]() |
Einstein seating: possible solution
This thread is a proposition to fix a problem that has bothered me since I went to my first Championship: Viewability when watching Einstein.
I propose the solution of pivoting the Einstein field 45 degrees so it faces into a corner of the stadium as opposed to how it is now.. hear me out. 1. Giant TV/ Suite seating: -Einstein currently lies directly in front of the big projecting screen and suite seating which is situated on the second level of the arena taking up basically all potential seating in front of the field on the second level. -Turning the field would allow for three entire levels of seats directly in front of of the field. 2. Surface area: -Currently, Einstein lies along the flat straight stands surrounding the arena. This ensures that only seats directly in front of the field can completely see what is happening—A relatively small amount of seats for such a large event. -Turning the field would allow for a larger amount of seats directly in front of the field because of the curvature as opposed to straight/linear seating. In addition the curvature of the field would act as a partial dome around the field (dome seating being the ideal seating situation for a field of this sort) allowing people a much better view even if they are not situated directly in front of the field. Obviously, there are also issues with doing this. Thoughts? Concerns? Other Solutions? Just an idea I had, Bryan |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Here is what I would REALLY like to see for a future championship.
1) Get rid of domes. They're such big caverns that the atmosphere is usually bad, the site lines are bad, etc. 2) Find a convention center next to a 20k-25k seat basketball arena. 3) Put one field in the arena and three fields in the pits (hey, I loved the pit fields - just get more seats). 4) Cycle the divisions through the arena field (thurs afternoon Curie, Friday morning, Newton, etc.) and the rest of the matches on the smaller fields. Remember the old days when they did this at EPCOT? It worked just fine. 5) Awards ceremony and Einstein matches in the basketball area, which would be JAMMED PACKED with spectators. The view would be good, and the atmosphere would be absolutely electric. It would feel like the NCAA basketball championship or game 7 of the Stanley Cup. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
The drive to Atlanta would take our team about 7 or 8 hours. The drive to St. Louis would take our team about 7 or 8 hours.
I don't want to go any farther west. :P |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
Greensboro's airport has very few connecting airports and the only major airlines that serve it are Delta, United, and US Airways (no service from Southwest or American Airlines). I have no idea what public transit exists there. Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Oh, Oh! I know where FIRST can go...Atlanta! Nothing was wrong with the Georgia Dome/GWCC.
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
Quote:
However, I think that playing in a convention centre, just wouldn't have the championship feel. Although St. Louis was my first trip to CMP, I felt that the Dome fields felt much more like a championship than the pit fields. This is just my opinion though... I would expect that FIRST will stay with Domes even after St. Louis, but only time will tell. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Cobo Hall would be perfect. The remodeling is going to be under way for the next few years, though. Maybe we'll see this in 2014 or so when it's finished?
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
On a separate note, I would like to see opening ceremonies shown on all of the field screens. 10k+ people trying to get from the pits to the dome and then back again all at once in a hury seems like a bit of a saftey hazard. And to think that there could have been a similar situation in BOTH directions is kind've scary.:eek: |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
http://www.seats3d.com/nba/indiana_pacers/ 3 Blocks away Convention Center or of course Lucas Oil Stadium. http://www.lucasoilstadium.com/Asset...wntown_Map.jpg |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Cobo Hall makes just too much sense! Think about it.
-Greatest concentration of FRC teams in the immediate area. (roughly 80 teams could potentially commute to the event) -2 large arenas that could hold a pair of fields each. -The big three automakers (together probably the largest sponsors of FRC teams) -Some parts of Detroit (particularly around Cobo) are not bad at all, and are actually vibrant urban communities -No fields in the pits. -Wings might not be playing there by the time it is feasible, leaving The Joe empty and desperate for events |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
I say the Orlando Convention Center would work amazingly, but youd have those bleachers like they had in the pits this year for all the seating, unlike an arena seating.
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
But as those before me said, the Joe holds the Wings (who won tonight!), and the arena attached only has 12k seats. Though, logistically, it would be a great location for CMP looking at team concentration. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
It would be nice :)
It would be an even shorter trip if they moved to the Metro Convention Centre and Rogers Centre (Skydome) in Toronto :D Only trouble is the Jays play there. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
Quote:
The NHL playoffs start a week or two before the NBA playoffs, usually. That makes any NHL-related stadiums near impossible to book. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
While I can see why a lot of people would wish to have the Champs in Detroit (or other east coast locations) due to the location of many teams, I feel it would actually hurt FIRST by doing so.
I participated with FIRST in Detroit (Team 217), Florida (Team 386) and now LA (Team 294). I've been to the champs in Disney, Atlanta and now St Louis. So I've seen how a region and teams are affected by the location of events. Having the champs in Detroit or similar would only further promote FIRST in relatively saturated regions that "get it" already. I feel there is a larger potential for FIRST growth further west and am glad to see champs in St Louis. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
The Edward Jones dome capacity is 66,965, which is close enough to 67000. If every seat was full from the Newton field to the Curie filed (50 yard line to 50 yard line), that would be 33,500. There was basically no one sitting around the corners (i.e. on the sidelines of the football field), which means maybe half of the 33,500 was being used. That puts an upper limit on the spectators at 16,750. I also don't think that the upper deck was nearly 100% full, which reduces that number further. I would put a high estimate at 15,000 people watching Einstein from the seats, so a 20,000+ seat arena should be plenty. (BTW, sorry for derailing your thread, Bryan.) |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
What was on the Back-side of Einstein? I would think there might be an excellent spot to put the 12 teams actually in einstein in bleachers on either side. This would likely free up a lot of "saved" room in the middle. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
They have done CMPS at the Stadium/Dome combo before, and our regional competitions used to be at the Arena. I think it is doable. Especially since both venues are HUGE. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
NHL/NBA playoffs knock out the majority of large capacity Basketball and Hockey venues. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
As for SkyDome/MTCC in Toronto, It would be awesome, and doable, however, I seriously doubt they'll ever hold championships outside of the continental US, if only because it simplifies travel plans for the majority of teams. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
This is probably to far west for most teams but the Anaheim Convention Center has a stadium attached that does not have a major sports team. It only seat 9,100 people but the only times this stadium is used is for NCAA basket ball early in the tournament. The great thing is that it is across from disneyland.
So maybe it is not ideal for championships but I thinking if California ever did a state championship, this would be a great place (and probably expensive). There has to be a few more convention centers like this one around the country with an unused stadium attached. Perhaps a stadium affiliated more with college sports? |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Perhaps FIRST should build its own venue (or 2 or 3).
Jane |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Thats what FIRST could do. Build 3 arenas to the same spec to what it needs to fit CMP perfectly, put one on the East Coast, West Coast, and Midwest. And then have a rotating CMP. Like 2012 would be East > 2013 would be Midwest > 2014 would be West >2015 would be East > etc... And you would try to keep them in line. Like East = Virginia, Midwest = Kansas, and West = California.
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
Jane |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
Quote:
Arenas and convention centers are MASSIVE undertakings. And local governments don't approve them unless they can see them being beneficial to the local community and cost effective. The degres of this undertaking is truly something well beyond what FIRST has ever done. They would need to find other tenants to share the venue with, design a venue that suits the needs of FIRST programs going forward but is still appealing for other uses, and find a location with the kind of infrastructure to support an FIRST Championship for a long, long time. And then you ask them to do it in two or three different locations? It sure is a nifty idea, but it's one that's completely beyond the scope of possibility for this program at this point in time. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
Even as a dream, isn't it fun to think of a place that would be established by the FIRST program but that others would love to use because of its adaptability, technical prowess and innovation, and awesome capabilities? Yes, that is a lot of fun. It may be frustrating for those who want to problem-solve with a points system and removing 3rd alliance partners or the RAS qualification. I understand and respect that type of thinking but when faced with large problems, I always see it as an opportunity to dream big. Really big. There is never any harm in dreaming. Heck, I never dreamed I'd be involved in FIRST for as long as I have, much less watching it expand as it has in recent years. I apologize to our OP for derailing this thread. Please go back to realistic problem-solving and solutions. Jane |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
BSA found that it would be simpler to own their own land for such a large event, enabling them to make the Jamboree even better than it already is. There is no reason why FIRST couldn't benefit from the same thing. It may not be a feasible thing for FIRST to do at this point, but as the program grows, it would make more and more sense to build a FIRST dome for CMP and other robotics events (such as regionals, non FRC events, Vex events, etc...). Another thing to look at is teaming up with a company/city who is building a dome/convention center to make a perfect FIRST location! |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
As for the comments by seveal people that Michigan is the exact opposite of the ideal place to hold WCs. I would like to ask if you are satisfied with a situation where each state has roughly 1 FRC team for every 58,000 citizens. Does FRC only have the chance to grow to up to 5,250 US teams?That sounds like a large number, yet consider the number of secondary schools in the US. There are approximately 37,000 public and private high schhols in America, most of them completely capable of supporting an FRC team. The largest roadblock however is money. Due to the district structure and the concentration of FRC teams within the state of Michigan, Michigan is the closest of any region to becoming the ideal region. If one model region is fostered and grown others will follow. By bringing the FIRST Championships to Michigan I argue that an unprecidented amount of growth would occur across the US and Canada (due to its proximity). My reasoning being that so many teams exist in Michigan, and Michigan teams are amongst the best teams a starting "mentored" FRC teams (see 3538, 3773, and 3539 as examples) that giving them a resource as great as the FIRST Championship would ony accelerate growth in the Michigan market. The next reason FIRST stands the greated benifit by holding champinships in Michigan is the potential for sponsorship revenue. As a group Michigan is a quite well funded region, however with increased growth comes a need for increased revenue. By placing the CMPs directly into the backyard of many large local corporations, Michigan would recieve the sponsorships necessary to gain more teams. Under my belief that the US can support as many teams as there are high schools there is room for 1,200 teams in Michigan so long as sufficient funds are available. The reason other regions would benifit from Michigan's growth is this. Government reacts slowly to things, yet it will eventually respond. If Michigan is able to have a total number of teams approximately equal to 350 within several years of gaining the CMP, it could possibly kickstart widescale recognition of FRC by local districts and state legislatures. Eventually school districts will realize it is more worthwhille giving their robotics team 15K than drowning 90k in the heating costs for a high school swimming pool (Monroe Public Schools spends $92,000 a year on swimming pool upkeep, with virtually no revenue sources or educational value in it). The more teams there are the more visible FIRST is. The more visible FIRST is the more attention it gets. The faster a single region gains visibility the faster other regional gain revenue from the increased visibility of the other region. The faster other regions become visible the quicker these regions gain teams. Sorry for that extremely long thought, and the typos; I had to do this using IE. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
Now if FIRST were to be given a gargantuan sum of money, that would at least be a step in the right direction. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Did anyone mention Phillips Arena back there in Atlanta? Seats 18-20k
Wouldn't it be funny to go back to ATL only to use the Arena next to the Georgia Dome? :D Of course with the Hawks and the Thrashers calling it home, I am sure it wouldn't work. |
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
The GWCC alone cost $350,000,000 to build. Granted you're not building the entire thing, but you want to build 2-3 halls of a convention center, plus a dome? That's probably $100,000,000 a pop. |
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
Re: Einstein seating: possible solution
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi