Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=95229)

Rob Stehlik 16-05-2011 21:44

pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design
 

Chris is me 16-05-2011 21:45

Re: pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design
 
I'm confused by the placement of the gas spring. Wouldn't the gas spring be pushing the arm into the ground, increasing the load?

Hawiian Cadder 16-05-2011 21:50

Re: pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design
 
if i remember correctly that is a pneumatic cylinder to aid in lifting.

akoscielski3 16-05-2011 22:41

Re: pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design
 
can you post a link to the CAD File :P

Thanks

Basel A 16-05-2011 22:51

Re: pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by akoscielski3 (Post 1061906)
can you post a link to the CAD File :P

Thanks


http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2534

DMetalKong 16-05-2011 23:26

Re: pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1061896)
I'm confused by the placement of the gas spring. Wouldn't the gas spring be pushing the arm into the ground, increasing the load?

The gas spring probably pulls inwards rather than pushing outwards, in which case it would make sense because it will be tugging the lever-arm on the other side of the pivot down, making the manipulator rise.

Mr. Lim 17-05-2011 08:26

Re: pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design
 
If the electrical/pneumatics side of the team was as diligent about CAD, it would be a lot more clear.

There is pressurized air supplied to only one side of that pneumatic cylinder, such that it is constantly pulling downwards. We had that air supply regulated to about 40 PSI, and it perfectly counterbalanced the arm uniformly through its entire length of travel, on both sides of the robot.

Unfortunately, whenever we ran the arm downwards, the air in the cylinder would compress, and the regulator would bleed excess pressure. While this was desired for both safety and uniform counterbalancing reasons, it used up a lot of the air whenever we moved our arm downward.

We ended up replacing the setup with a few loops of surgical tubing.

Rob Stehlik 17-05-2011 09:54

Re: pic: Team 610's 2011 robot design
 
The reason for using an air cylinder instead of a gas spring was because we wanted the arm to swing both ways to pick up on either side of the robot. Most gas springs push instead of pull, and putting one underneath the arm would have caused interference with the arm pivot, limiting the range to less than 180 degrees. Pulling from the back end of the arm allows the cylinder to swing underneath the pivot and then serve to balance the arm when it is facing the other direction.
I have since learned from an 1114 mentor that "pull" gas springs are readily available. Good to know.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi