pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

Looks good! Only question I have is you called it "Northwest Drive". Is this any different from West Coast Drive? If so, what are the differences and advantages/disadvantages? I'm assuming the duel omnis on the corners are for ease of turning, and that there is no drop on the center wheel because of that.

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

This chain-path is on the outside of the frame rails. Traditional WCD has an inside chain-path. This also doesn't look like it has the characteristic bearing blocks of a real WCD.

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

Just curious, why the 4 inch wheels? The smallest I've heard of in the past are 6 inches. Also, don't be nervous about posting stuff on here. It looks really good and you should be proud of your work. We may ask questions, but we try not to be too scary.

Jason

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

254 used 3.5" this year and 233's wheels were smaller. In recent years, small wheels have been one of the defining features of "west coast drive" robots such as this. Just look at the robots of two of the current world champions. :P

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

bout 2.75in rims on the corners last year.

next year expect possibly 2.5in rims for packaging reasons.

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

I do believe that there have been WCD robots with the chain in both locations and even a few wit it inside of the frame rail. The real distigushing feature here is that this robot has omni-corners and no drop on the center wheel. ALL true west coast drives have droped center wheels and none use omniwheels.

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

Why though? What is the functional advantage?

Jason

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

-Less Weight
-Cheaper Material
-Less Machine Time
-Less Gearing, 233 may get away with only one stage of gearing?
-Better acceleration
-More efficient.

-RC

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

Less, and thus lighter, gearing results in the same effective ratio, also the wheels are smaller. the weight savings might be enough of a reason, but smaller wheels and the associated gearing allow the motors to operate at a different, possibly more efficient part of the performance curves.

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

That is not strictly true. While at the same rpm the smaller wheels would go at a different (slower) speed, the gear ratio could be used to compensate. While there are fewer gears necessary to get the same speed,there isn't a change in the fact that, with enough gears, you can gear for any speed

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

I like it, but how are you attach your SS? and why did you make a "V" in front instead of adding a front rail because the rules for the bumpers this year would not allow that. How exactly are you planning to mount the bumpers to the 1' alum. tubing on the sides? and do I spy a custom center wheel? last question I promise, hex axle or keyed axle?

But looks great keep up the good work

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

There is no single distinguishing feature for a real WCD IMO, I only consider 254 based drives to be real WCDs.

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

Thanks for the responses. I knew there was a good reason just couldn't figure it out. I still have my reservations about such small wheels, but that is probably just because they are new to me.

Jason

Re: pic: Pigmice Northwest Drive
 

I've been thinking of a similar design, but I was planning on using 4 plaction wheels in the center with the 4 omnis in the corners. I believed this would help increase stability from being spun by other robots.
8 wheel - 4 plaction center, 4 omni corners for stability and forward pushing. No drop.

Anybody think the 4 wheel center would actually do anything to fight being spun from other robots pushing your corners?