![]() |
Re: pic: 1675's REAL IRI Upgrade
Quote:
|
Re: pic: 1675's REAL IRI Upgrade
Quote:
|
Re: pic: 1675's REAL IRI Upgrade
Quote:
My guess is that without securing the treads to the mecanum hubs the diagonal force of the rollers would pop the treads off or tangle them in the wheel if it popped off diagonally. If secured to the wheel it would just act like a lumpy traction wheel. If secured to the wheel AND strafing was tried, the robot would be trying to pull itself apart and go nowhere. |
Re: pic: 1675's REAL IRI Upgrade
Quote:
|
Re: pic: 1675's REAL IRI Upgrade
Quote:
|
Re: pic: 1675's REAL IRI Upgrade
I don't think we ever experimented with a 3 axis joystick. We've always gone with the two stick approach. Back in the day, we just used the X-axis of the left stick for crab angle. I think 2008 was the first time that we used both X and Y to use the full circle of the stick for wheel angle.
I would think that the control that you described, where the Z axis of the stick determined the crab angle would be really hard to work with. I feel like you would lose a ton of resolution between the range of motion of the stick, and the physical dexterity required to twist the stick (as opposed to deflecting it). Like I said, I've never tried it, so if someone has had good success with that setup, more power to you. |
Re: pic: 1675's REAL IRI Upgrade
We have tried 3-axis joysticks to control holonomic/strafing drive trains in the past, but always found that two sticks works much better.
It is simply too easy to twist when you only meant to deflect, and visa versa. |
Re: pic: 1675's REAL IRI Upgrade
Reported
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi