![]() |
Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
In some other threads, I noticed programmers talking about sending data to the cRIO directly over TCP/UDP ports. Was this competition-legal? If so, what ports were accessible to us?
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
More information was given about the open TCP/UDP ports available for use in Team Update 5 (section 2.2.8)
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Thanks for the link! And indeed, if you have any sample code, I would definitely like to see it - out team is experimenting with this sort of thing in the offseason.
This certainly has the potential to be very useful - in the past, we've used the DS front panel as a way to get a lot of debugging information about the live robot, but this means we also have the capacity to send a wide variety of command/control signals without having to pipe it through USB or Analog/Digital pins =] |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
2 Attachment(s)
No problem. Attached are two VIs, one for sending UDP packets, and one for receiving UDP packets. They show the basic concept of sending/receiving UDP packets (can also be substituted for TCP packets, the theory is the same - just substitute TCP VIs for UDP VIs). The network communication VIs can be found in the Data Communication -> Protocols -> UDP or TCP palate.
Now, there are two main ways you can do this. First you can "piggyback" off of the regular packets going between the robot and DS. To do that, in your robot code, open "Build Dashboard Data.vi" (in Team Code folder) and you can modify that cluster with your custom data (also make sure the "Dashboard Datatype.ctl" typedef is updated as well, you'll need that later). Then, in a custom dashboard project, update the big constant on the left side of the loop with the Dashboard Datatype (you can just copy&paste), and you can get your data there, after unflattening it from a string. However, if you want to send data from the dashboard to the robot, the above method won't work very well. You have to use something related to the code I attached. In "Dashboard Main.vi" open up your connection outside the loop and read or write from it on the inside (you will want to put a pretty small timeout on that, maybe 50ms. This will keep your code executing quickly). Then, on the robot side, you can open a connection on the same port (make sure it's one of the ones open on the field) and do the opposite (read or write) of the dashboard. Also, I should throw in an obligatory warning: do not use this to circumnavigate the standard way of driving robots (i.e. driverstation -> FMS -> robot). By this, I mean: only use this to send auxiliary data between the driverstation and robot. Do NOT attempt to try and get around the usual means of communication, only supplement them. As always, if you have any questions or if I missed something, let me know, and I'll be glad to help. |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Hi I keep getting an error
"Error 56 occurred at UDP Read in Receiver.vi->Dashboard Main.vi" The errors are coming from this subVI that you have provided. Do you know if the ports have changed in the new 2012 LabVIEW or if there is another incompatibility? Thank You for your help in advance |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Error 56 means that your code has timed out (i.e. the network hasn't given LabVIEW a response in an appropriate amount of time). Since the error is coming from the Read VI, that means that your code is waiting for a packet to be sent, but one isn't being sent. That makes your code time out.
Since that example wasn't really intended to be used on a robot, I did not specify a Timeout value (see the UDP Read Docs), as the example was really only to demonstrate syntax. Now, that doesn't mean you can't use it on your robot, you'll just have to tweak a few things to get it to run in real time. First, where in the code structure are you putting this VI (since you said the error happened in Read.vi, I'm assuming this is in the robot part of the code)? It should probably go in Timed Tasks.vi. There, you can make a while loop only for your UDP communication and put a relatively slow delay on it (~100 ms?). Then, you should put timeout values on your network VIs. The value is in milliseconds, so a value around 100 is probably good (this depends on how fast your loop runs). If this code is on the driver station, then I'd just recommend using the dashboard communication that is already taking place to send data from robot->DS; it'l be much easier to work with (see my last post). But, if you're sending data from dashboard->robot, then this is one of the better options. If you keep getting errors, you can always unbundle the error out cluster and check if it's a timeout error (the code part of the cluster is 56) and clear that specific error. I can elaborate on that more, if you need. |
i have not checked the latest cRIO image but last years version had a problem with an unchecked buffer. the tcpip would crash the communications with the robot if to many directed packets arrived at the robot but were not retrieved from the buffer. To avoid this, make sure that the robot code us running before you start sending data to it, and limit you traffic to the robot. I used this method to control the robot via an Android and IOS devices in the off season.
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Would it be legal to do vision processing in the Dashboard and sending the results to the cRIO? If so it seems like the easiest solution. The Dashboard already receives a camera image, and its computation power is hardly used while driving the robot. I'm just not sure about the rules (couldn't see any that disallow it but may have missed it or didn't look well enough).
Just for convenience, here's the port list from this year's manual: Quote:
So yeah, questions: 1. Is port 1130 used in the default code? Is it used in any optional SubVIs that make things easier? (I don't really need it to be easier) 2. Would it be legal to do vision processing in the Dashboard and sending the results to the cRIO? (If it's legal, is it legal during Autonomous/Hybrid as well?) |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
2 Attachment(s)
We're trying something similar to the OP here: We want to have the Dashboard sent to the robot using UDP. We're simply opening a socket on UDP port 1130, using the Flatten to String function to turn the image into a string for transmission, then sending to the cRIO w/ the UDP Read function. However, we're getting the following error:
Quote:
EDIT: Turns out the Clear Simple Errors VI was missing. This issue's cleared up. Now, though, the data doesn't seem to be getting to the cRIO. We're reading the UDP socket from the Periodic Tasks VI, and the Emptry String function is reading True, which says to me that there isn't any information coming through the UDP connection. |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
See the edit.
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
UDP is a very basic communications protocol, quite good for sending small amounts of data in a repeating fashion. If you find yourself with more data than will fit in UDP ( about 1500 bytes is typical ), I'd suggest using TCP.
TCP will automatically break a big packet into smaller ones, and reassemble on the read end. It ignores duplicates, checks for missing elements and corrupted elements, and puts sub packets back in order if they happen to arrive out of order. There are other difference too, but the camera and other HTTP sessions are based on TCP. The error you received was indicating that the buffer was bigger than the UDP limit. When the issue looked cleared up, it was just that you were discarding the error. As I pointed out in the other thread, there is no reason to send an image. The dashboard already displays it. Why send it again? Greg McKaskle |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
How big is the UDP buffer? Because all that I'm sending is the Target Info array from the vision code flattened to a string...
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
I believe the UDP limit is somewhat dependent on the devices being used, but in this instance, I think 1500 bytes or so.
Greg McKaskle |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
1 Attachment(s)
The TCP code in the screenshot is giving me the following error:
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
3 Attachment(s)
This thread has been quite helpful. I am still somewhat stuck with an issue on the cRIO crashing when I send UDP to it. I suspect it has something to do with the buffers, but if anyone has helpful advice, I'm open to it!
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
A couple of TCP and UDP tips and comments:
-A UDP packet is designed to fit in one Ethernet frame, limiting it to 1500bytes minus UDP headers. I believe a UDP header is 8 bytes, but don't quote me on that -TCP is designed to send streams of bytes instead of packetized data. The disadvantage to this is that the sending application must explicitly manage the send buffer and force TCP to send it all of the bytes, and the receiving application must manage packet starts/ends. -TCP is also a reliable medium, with error checking and retransmission. This is usually a bad thing if you care more about getting the data fast than getting all of it (if you miss a targeting packet, you will get another one in about 50ms, so you just ignore it). -UDP is a better choice for this application due to the speed and packet-oriented nature. -The UDP listener should have errors trapped and a timeout set to a fairly low number (I use 1000ms) - I use trapped errors as a source of determining if I actually should unbundle the packet and use it -The UDP listener should exist in its own thread (While loop) throttled by nothing other than itself - There should be no waits. The UDP listener will block for new packets, and if you are behind in receiving packets then it's a bad thing. -Send the smallest packets possible - Do all target filtering and multiple target analysis (stuff that works with arrays of targets) on the laptop, and send a single target coordinate to the robot over UDP - This keeps the packet size under the limit and non-variable. |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
I didn't run your code yet, but looking at the screenshots, it does look like you are only reading the udp data five times a second, pretty slow. But you shouldn't crash the cRIO doing that. What sort of crash is it?
Greg McKaskle |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
CD,
Man, most of this stuff is over my head. Is there a simple example somewhere to show how to display a PWM channel, Joystick Input, or global variable on the Dashboard? |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
There is an example in the Tutorials that come with LabVIEW.
From the Getting Started window, look at Tutorials -> Tutorial 7 - Integrating Examples into Robot CodeThen page down to Part 2 and it gives a step-by-step using a gyro output as an example. |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Thanks Mark for pointing me to the right section. One observation and one question remains.
Observation - It may be implied or understood, however, in order to have the Dashboard Main.vi become updated with the changes shown in the tutorial I found myself creating my own dashboard project on the classmate and then manually moving the 3 files created by the dashboard project (C:\Users\developer\documents\Labview Data\builds|FRC Dashboard Project|FRC PC Dashboard) to the C:\Program Files\FRCDashboard subdirectory in order for the classmate to find the new Dashboard Main.vi (did I rename the two original files in the directory late last night before copying?). Question: I am trying to extend the example to multiple pieces of data rather than just one by trying to use the bundle function in the Dashboard Main.vi function but it doesn't seem to take it. I was able to bundle, flatten to string and input this to the Driver station Set User Data HI function inside my robot project code. Should I be able to unpack this in my new dashboard project or is the Data Hi function simplistic? |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
2 Attachment(s)
Copying the Dashboard files to FRC Dashboard works, you also have the options of changing the build destination to FRC Dashboard so it always gets put there when you build, or changing the Driver Station .ini file to point to your dashboard location.
Here is an example of some quick Dashboard diagnostics looked at from both the robot and the PC side of things. This is slapped together, so take it as development code. The elements are in the order they were added to the cluster on the robot side. I recreate an indicator "358 Custom data" whenever I add or remove elements, then copy that to the Dashboard side to define the order/types of elements in the cluster. In the final robot I'd create a TypeDef to define each data element. That gives everything a name making it easier to digest and clearer to work with. |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Alan and Mark,
Alan - Thanks for commenting. I understand what you are saying, just need to fumble my way through Labview to make it work. Mark - Jackpot! That's exactly the example I was looking to find. Now, time to fight with Labview again to make it work. Is there a way to bookmark/highlight that example in our documentation - great job! BTW, can you point to an example about the 358 Custom Data vi object? This is a new function for me to work with. Mine is not shaded pink yet. |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Phil Lopreiato,
THanks for the tip - very helpful for folks like me struggling their way through Labview- especially the copy and paste of the Indicator. |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
1 Attachment(s)
Mark's 358 Custom Data Indicator looks different than mine -- what did he do differently? I can't seem to select the one in the menu. I selected an indicator but his has bubbles?? Does he have some kind of "Mr Bubbles special arrangement"?
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Right-click on the indicator and un-check "View as icon"
Or in my case, I un-checked the Tools->Options->Block Diagrams->General->Place front panel terminals as icons. |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
So we tried doing this same thing with out dashboard and robot. Specifically sending three enum values from the dashboard to the robot. We got this working when we were running live on the robot through labview on a development computer. We would get one of the "The loop containing the RobotDrive code is running to slowly" error every once in a while but the code would function almost perfectly.
Once we deployed the code to the robot ("set as startup" after building), however, we started to get "Watchdog not fed" errors that would stop the code. Once we pulled the UDP receive stuff from the code on the robot, everything started working right. We decided to use the digitial inputs on the driverstation instead, but I would like to figure out what we did wrong in the old code. Does anyone have any ideas why this would have happened? |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
I glanced through the forum posts, but couldn't find how you are doing the UDP. Where was it running? Make sure you build and Run as Startup so that you are running the new code. The behavior shouldn't change between the debug-run and the build-run.
If you don't figure it out, post the code or pictures of it. Greg McKaskle |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Has anyone managed to solve the problem of the UDP transmission interfering with the normal Driver Station communication?
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
What problem?
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
See, every time we've tried to send information to the robot using UDP, it's hindered the regular communication: The robot will stall during Teleop and Autonomous, the communications light on the Driver station will turn on and off, and occasionally, we'll lose the connection entirely.
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
Send Receive |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Right now the image processing is in the same loop as the udp send, but we did separate it from this loop to check if that was slowing down the code, but there was no difference in effect. Again, the problem is that when we "run as startup" we get enough watchdog errors to make the robot essentially undrivable. Edit: forgot to note the "larger" sized photo is the send and the smaller is the recieve |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
You're missing a Wait in the second block diagram.
That will suck all the life out of your CPU. |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Well we did have a wait in there (30 ms), but while using the debug-run we started to get watchdog errors which had us loose control for a few moments about every 10 seconds. Those errors were more or less random and we had times where they would not happen for about a minute and then they would continuously happen. After taking out that wait we stopped seeing that problem and actually thought we had everything fixed - until we did a "run as startup".
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
My only concern about that is that we were able to send data using our code to the robot so the actual communication was not having problems, and because the open is outside of all loops I don't see how it could have caused the communication indeterminacy/watchdog errors when the communication was working. We did have the UDP Write VI using our team IP (which we got using the global variable for Robot IP). |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
We are running a modified version of the supplied Rectangle routine. Right now it is running as an independent program. We have the Drivers Station, Dashboard, and our image processing running. Is there a reason or rule that requires that the image processing be integrated into Dashboard? Will FMS know or care that it is a standalone program? |
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
Quote:
|
Re: Transmitting data to the cRIO from the Driver's station via TCP/UDP
The only required program is the Driver Station app.
The Dashboard is entirely optional as well as any other programs, such as the Kinect Server. I've run wordpad so I could take notes. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi