![]() |
MAR
I was wondering how many qualifiers can you attend in this new format? I am very interested in the answer
|
Re: MAR
If it's like the Michigan model, 2 qualifying events. If you gain enough points, then you can attend the MAR championship.
In MI, when there were open spaces remaining, teams could sign up for a 3rd district (for only $500). The points toward the state championship were counted only in the first 2 district events you attended. |
Re: MAR
thx
|
Re: MAR
According to discussion at the last MAR meeting, each team will get two Qualifying events with their initial Registration. From there a team can chose to compete in a 3rd District if space is available - the price for the 3rd event is still being discussed, it could be $500 as in Michigan, or it could me more or less depending on what is decided by MAR ($1000 was the tentative number).
Also, only your first two events will count towards the points needed to qaulify for the state Championship. |
Re: MAR
Not everything is set in stone with FIRST yet which is why not all details have been made public. There will be a webinar shortly for all teams to ask questions and get more details. Stay posted.
|
Re: MAR
Quote:
I don't want to sound rude, but the fact that we launched a campaign in 2009 requesting transparency from FIRST about their 5 year plan, yet we who are not part of the MAR planning stages, are being left in the dark about anything going on until "it is just right" to make public, sounds ironic and hypocritical to me and other mentors who I spoke to. We generally do not care to hear something only when it is set in stone, we want to be updated about things being discussed and deliberated upon. FIRST might have been translucent, but right now "MAR is opaque," to quote a friend. Its a little sad when I have to go to my old team to ask what the plans are for districts and what rules are being discussed along with the prices still. We want information as it is being discussed, just like so many mentors in FIRST wanted to hear these same things back in 2009. Hope that did not sound rude, as I deeply respect some of the folks in MAR. Please let me know if there is a way to join the planning committee. A simple list of "This is what's up in the air" and "This is what is concrete" is all I ask for. To quote the specific paragraph from the 2009 letter: Quote:
Edit: Who is the "head" of MAR? |
Re: MAR
Maybe it's FIRST who's insisting on non-disclosure rather than MAR. Just a thought.
|
Re: MAR
The board meetings are public and notices of them were sent out to the membership list in advance. Many people have dialed in to them. Are you a member? You should have received email notification.
|
Re: MAR
Quote:
Do you mean member of the board? If so, then no. PM'd you to keep the thread clear. Thanks Carol!:) |
Re: MAR
Quote:
Um, not to be insulting, but I remember at least 3 web meetings and 2 face-to-face meetings in the past several months. Plus a pile of e-mails. Are you a MAR member? If so, you know this. If not, why not? Send an e-mail to Ed Petrillo of team 293 SPIKE (his e-mail is edward.petrillo, in the gmail dot com domain) and he'd be tickled pink to sign you up. Membership is free, open to anyone in the MAR region, and everyone gets a vote. That being said - and as the guy who penned that 2009 letter - this is not FIRST, it's MAR. Two different organizations. And I haven't seen a more open and transparent group in a long time. (Though, I admit, they don't communicate via the web very well :rolleyes: ). Before I enter rant mode, join up, then we'll talk. Or ask Ed your questions, he's a nice guy. |
Re: MAR
Quote:
And like I said, my intention wasn't to sound rude or insulting, just trying to get more information. Not trying to grind anyone's gears. And if they did communicate via the web more my comments may have never been brought up. |
Re: MAR
Maybe it's hard to join up if you don't know how to join up. If that bit of info did not get out to Akash (or his team), or any other team within the region, that is a problem--and it's not that team's problem.
Let's just say, as an example, that I were in the MAR area. (I'm not.) I've noticed the (relatively few) CD discussions on the topic--but very few even of those have the "how to get information" stuff posted. Now Bill's Blog comes out and says, "MAR is a go, welcome!" I have very little information on what is going on within MAR (besides what I've managed to pick up on CD). Maybe I haven't gotten a message, electronic or otherwise, from anybody within the organization group on how to get in on the information loop (and I'm in the target area, for the sake of this example). I'm going to want the missing information--and having people tell me "You should have the info from all these meetings" (that I didn't know how to be a part of, at the very least) is NOT going to make me any happier about not knowing what's up! If that is the case--that the info did not make it out to all the teams in the region--then it may be a really, really, really good idea to contact all the teams and verify that they did or did not get the information on joining up. As a matter of fact, it probably wouldn't hurt to do it anyway, especially any rookies that sign up. If, after someone has learned how to get the information, they don't use that option, then that is their choice. But if they don't have that information in the first place, then it is the responsibility of whoever is making the decisions to get that information to those people. |
Re: MAR
MAR has done everything in their power to try and inform everyone in the region that this is happening and how to get involved in the planning process. That is absolutely not MAR's problem. They were even handing out flyers at regionals last season. Honestly, any active mentor in the region pretty much had to intentionally avoid MAR not to be exposed to it at some point this summer.
|
Re: MAR
Quote:
Eric, since you are not even close to the target group, does it make much sense that you would have been hit with MAR informational minutes or information? Perhaps another rookie team could comment on how that has actually happened, and it would be much more useful to the MAR planning committee. Finally starting with "X, just a little hint." sounds pretty condescending to me. Even if someone was giving me the best advice in the world, if it was delivered like that I'm not sure I would listen. Still waiting for a District/Qualifier to come to a region near me... :cool: |
Re: MAR
Quote:
Aside from that I've already been in touch with the parties I need to be in touch with thanks to Don and Ed. I have also apologized already to Ed if I came across in a bad manner. I will also be helping them get the info out to teams likes ours who were in limbo during the summer and in the previous season and did not have all the info, including newly registering teams. |
Re: MAR
Quote:
That was my point. I've been following this thread today, and it just seems like the folks that are active in MAR are assuming that their information on how to be involved with planning and meetings and all that made it to everybody. This information is incorrect, or was...but operating under the assumption that everyone who wants to be involved has information on how to get involved is not ideal. Flyers at events, assuming both that they have the information needed to get involved and that they are distributed appropriately, do have a tendency to end up in piles of paperwork or in the trash or buried in someone's bag. Email, though better, can still break down, as shown here. Hey, maybe a post on CD about "Hey, we're forming X group, here's how to get involved" would work--but I didn't exactly see that info in a post. Definitely a good effort, now that I hear what they did. Team communication breakdowns are not the fault of the organization. Just maybe a general announcement via some non-email communication might have been a really good idea. Ian, I'll be editing that part about "hint" out of my original post. I apologize if anyone took that the wrong way. I just tend to get rather irritated about communication breakdowns--the more critical the communicated information, the more irritated I get. |
Re: MAR
Since I anticipate the Connecticut teams asking me, can someone please clarify which teams can attend MAR events? Some of my teams have been going to NJ and PA Regionals for a long time... And no, I haven't been in the communications loop for this.
|
Re: MAR
Quote:
If lead mentors don't pass on information received, that's not the fault of the sender. I know how that works. I relied for years on people reprinting email blasts here on CD, because our mentor didn't read his emails (from anyone) on a regular basis. |
Re: MAR
Quote:
|
Re: MAR
Quote:
That being said, I don't have much knowledge of MAR. What I do know is from being in touch with my old teammates on MORT and seeing the few posts about it here on CD. I can understand how some people in the MAR region may be irritated if information was not communicated to them (if indeed, it was not brought to their attention). With all that said, I am not 'in the loop' so to speak. I don't know what was done by the MAR committee to reach out to teams, and I'm not going to speculate as to what did, or didn't occur. To me, just as bad as non-communication is over-communication. I personally don't see much constructive discussion in offering somewhat arbitrary examples of miscommunication. I think Akash did the right thing and brought up the question to a body of people that could help (albeit he may have been able to say it a littttttle bit nicer ;) ). He got an answer from a fellow FIRSTer, and now assumingly, he will have the communication channel he desired. Let's just leave it at that, especially if we have no direct view into what is happening in MAR. Otherwise, it's just extra discussion to cloud the clear messages people are looking for. -Brando |
Re: MAR
Just stepping into this discussion for a minute, I promise.
Texas has had some discussions about districting and I have not been in the loop. I'm not a lead mentor on our team and I haven't requested to be a part of the decision-making process. When I've read things that I've questioned - Bill's Blog comes to mind - I contact one or two of the people involved in the decision-making process and ask them to fill me in as best they can. It isn't anyone in CD although a few of them do participate in this forum. If one wants to know what's going on in the area and who to contact, it is always good to begin with the Regional Director, Assistant Regional Director, or the FIRST Senior Mentor of that area. If multiple states are involved, I would still follow that plan. They are the people directly connected to FIRST and to their region. I also believe that too many people involved in the planning and decision-making process, slow it down. There's an element of trust that has to be involved - trusting that the decisions are being made carefully by people invested in making the FIRST programs stronger and better for the teams and their communities. Jane |
Re: MAR
Quote:
|
Re: MAR
Quote:
If you wouldn't have come up with that on your own, and if you weren't part of a team in the area, and if you didn't go to any competitions where the information was available, then I don't know what to tell you. Quote:
Quote:
I'm also more than a little confused about Akash's position. The team went defunct? If that's the case, I don't really see how anyone could expect its former members to be specifically targeted with useful information. I'd say that disbanding a team and not going to any events fits the description of "intentionally" avoiding MAR. |
Re: MAR
Quote:
There are probably a number of teams that don't have an active CD presence that have a FIRST forum presence that's a little more active. I wouldn't call disbanding a team and not going to any events intentionally avoiding something. There are probably quite a few teams that don't do anything over the summer/early fall as a team while they take time off. Saying that teams like that, especially with active mentors, are intentionally avoiding something is probably not accurate. |
Re: MAR
EricH, based on your reading of chiefdelphi and posting, if you didn't see it, it probably wasn't a thread here.
Alan, Akash was a mentor on a team what went defunked due to reasons I do not have knowledge of but has maintained a high level of involvement in FIRST at college. As far as I know he has been working with a larger group of mentors and a different school to start a new rookie team. I would hope that as more areas move to the district system (I expect New England to follow suit in the next few years) that they will create websites/blogs to document and update the teams involved. |
Re: MAR
Quote:
In any case, Eric and others, discussing the communication topic- Don already posted how to get into the communication loop. You guys really don't need to continue the conversation. Ed already emailed me about why some teams might have slid through the gaps as well. Moving on: Here's some places where information about MAR will be published. http://mar.us.com/ http://www.midatlanticrobotics.com/downloads/ |
Re: MAR
Quote:
(I would have been very surprised, stunned, and even upset to discover a similar thing happening in the Midwest, because I am tuned in to the Indiana FRC scene, and I do participate in mentor meetings, and I am aware only of preliminary musings on how it might be made to work.) |
Re: MAR
Quote:
|
Re: MAR
Quote:
Quote:
I fully agree, CD is not MAR's medium of choice. But is that really a failing? Seriously, like Lavery wrote... Quote:
Quote:
==== All that being said: I'm pointedly asking anyone to volunteer ideas for how THEY might communicate something like MAR to their area. My intent in asking is to document some good ideas for anyone who finds themselves having to do this in the future...and we should all realize that, in high-density areas, it's destiny (sorry about the pun...):p |
Re: MAR
Quote:
|
Re: MAR
Not to Double Post but, MAR webinar is live now (~7pm EST): http://www.anymeeting.com/WebConfere...p_ek=MARBoard1
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi