![]() |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
If "you" are one of the top 75% RPI, SATs or top 25% Penn State SATs, or the top 90% of Penn State-Honors College SATs* (all of which are the same number), you're going to see very similar resources, support, training, graduation rates--most everything--at most of the good universities for your program. The amount of effort this takes "you" will not be strongly correlated to the size of the university, how much you pay, or what you mascot is. Now, if "you" are not one of those people, "you" aren't likely to end up at the honors college or RPI. "You" are statistically more likely end up at a large state school or something similar. "You" may well feel you have less support, access, opportunities, or whatever it is. This is not entirely the school's fault: those opportunities are out there, advertised, sometimes even pushed on you. They may even be more numerous at the typical large university. (Inconclusive; I have no good way to quantify this.) Yes, "you" may end up feeling like a number, but much of this is student complacency in ignoring these resources. Such complacency would likely have a similar effect at RPI (in fact, I've seen this), but it has fewer students there who are prone to this. In summary, the statistics on this issue (or any issue) should not be taken out of context. "You", as far as the statistics I have seen, are not really more likely to do poorly, drop out, or switch majors at a large school than a small school, or vice versa for that matter. "You" won't even necessarily have a more difficulty accessing resources at a large school. I argue this is not a case of a few, but a trend of the many. Schools' resources differ, their curricula differ. But in the end they're just that: different. High dropout rates correlating to certain aspects does not indicate a causation between the characterized systems and the rates. *I agree, SAT scores are really not a very good way to measure this. Insert some non-existent perfect measure of intelligence here. EDIT: To clarify on the topic of class sizes, I think I've had 2 courses in which grad students did part of the teaching. One was absolutely outstanding--one of the best teachers I've ever had--and I took him deliberately. The other was for a lecture class that I took because I wanted to be able to leave early for robotics (this course also went very well). All of the rest of my classes have been taught by completely professors. Almost all of them have been outstanding teachers as well as exceptionally gifted engineers/scientists/whathaveyou. As for being irrelevant to intro classes, I have friends that got into those groundbreaking labs as freshmen--first semester freshmen. Granted, they weren't doing anything profound, but they were there--and they still are. Only now they're publishing, writing theses, speaking at conferences. |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
That said, their work is highly irrelevant towards students studying intro level classes. My physics professors have some interesting stories that they tell on occasion, but they have no affect on me learning physics. It really doesnt matter if a university physics professor, or a high school physics teacher teaches me about kinematic equations, I will learn it either way. Just because the school is big, doesnt mean you cant talk to your professors. They will answer questions that students have during lecture, and they also have scheduled office hours. If their office hours dont fit someones schedule, they can email the professor and set up a time to meet. |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
|
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
This corresponds to more opportunities, though the ratio varies by school (for both small and large, of course). I've gotten in good contact with many of my professors. Some have become close research/professional partners, a few are friends. I know several lab directors by their first names. The alumni network is huge (record-holding) and also great for these opportunities. I've built this up over the years, of course, but had a strong base by late freshman and sophomore year. I've never had a professor that I wanted to correspond with and couldn't. I've never felt limited by the school size, and am perennially impressed by the quantity and quality of opportunities and people it brings together. Do 90% of Penn Staters do this? No, but thousands do. I'm below average in this list in some ways (largely because of my commitment to ROTC). These systems understandably have a huge impact on retention for those with the interest. How many students at RPI engage in similar things? (Sorry, looking for an all-encompassing term.) How do the opportunities compare? I honestly don't know. Can anyone shed some light on this? |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
Yes, you like your small school. Some of us like larger schools. Some of us learn better when working with our peers. I enjoy my 400 student chemistry lecture. Some of us like the large amount of opportunities presented by a larger school. Some people like the intimacy of a smaller school. Not everyone is just like you. Just because a small school is the right fit for you, doesn't mean its the right fit for everyone. I love my large school. I would most likely be miserable at a small school. You like your small school. You probably would not be happy a big school. People are different. Understand that one size does not fit all. |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
Like I said earlier, I got my job at Boeing because of RPI's alumni, and UTC subsidiaries and GE are always here hiring people. My friends who have graduated are working on projects like the 787, F135, Purepower Geared Turbofan, Hummingbird UAV, and the Falcon 9... so at least our recent alumni work on neat things! That said, there are a million ways to success... I firmly believe that successful people will be successful regardless of where they go to school. [quote=Katie_UPS]I enjoy my 400 student chemistry lecture.[/QUOTE Why? Not a dig, genuinely curious why you'd prefer 400 kids in a class vs. 40 or so where you might get a chance to ask a question if you were confused. |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
Additionally, I can ask questions if I'm confused. There are tricks (ie sitting in the front of the classroom) that allow for you to get the small school feel in a big school setting. |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
What I am seeing from several of the previous posts is a common theme - All of you are passionate. Passionate about your education - big school, small school, peer groups and most importantly your education. This is the key ingredient to recruit and retain students in any educational career field. Passion is what is missing in most high school and middle school classrooms where the students lose interest. Passion fuels curiosity which leads to engagement which leads to learning and retention.
Ask any friend if they have a favorite music group. Ask them if they know the lyrics to their favorite songs from that group. The answer is going to be yes. They are likely passionate about that group and music. Develop passion for content in schools, both teacher and student, and the dropout rates of challenging courses will drop. |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
|
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
Katie I totally agree with you on the point that everyone has their own tastes. Everyone learns differently and in their own way. Part of the college experience is really understanding yourself and how you can become the best student you can be. When I reread Alex's statement that you quoted above, I think you may be jumping to a conclusion slightly. When I read what he says that "people don't pay to go to a school so they can learn from their peers" I think he's generally correct. People attend college expecting to learn from intelligent professors. While PLENTY of learning occurs from your peers, the general idea I think is that someone is there to help if you get REALLY stuck and your peers can't help. I think your last paragraph above kind of points to this. You go to class, sit up front so you can hear and be seen. You pay attention so that if you do get confused you can ask the professor questions, not your fellow classmates (even though they may be able to help you get the answer). -Brando |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
There could be countless other factors messing with the results; one person, for example, mentioned that certain schools are specifically catered to only special programs. WPI and RPI both are great engineering schools, while not nearly as big in the other fields, and the students entering there know they're great engineering schools. On the other hand, students at large schools have a much easier time switching to different programs because of the available options and such. |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
|
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
-Brando |
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
|
Re: Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard)
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:46. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi