![]() |
Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Does anybody know the size/pressure specs of the standard FRC pneumatic tubing? Trying to find it on www.freelin-wade.com
Thanks, Nathan |
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Yes, they have all the psi ratings on both Andymark.com aand Bimba.com.
I found the standard Pneumatic tubing on AndyMark. http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-2028.htm If you are leaning more towards pistons and that sort of thing then Bimba is more your way. -- Hope This Helps, Brendan |
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Does anyone have a McMaster part number equivalent for the pneumatic tubing we get in the kit of parts? I recall getting some tubing from them once and it was very different.
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Do you think that using tubing with an inside diameter of .125 instead of .17 would greatly effect performance?
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
It would also |
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Yes, it would. The speed would be affected (if I'm not mistaken, it would be faster). For another, the OD is what governs fit in fittings, and a smaller ID results in a smaller OD (or a thicker wall for the same OD), which affects how it fits in the fittings. I've seen very nearly identical pieces of tubing not fit the same in a fitting, though... but it wasn't the style normally used in FRC.
And, perhaps more importantly, 2011's <R65> and <R66-D>, read in that order, will tell you that anything other than 0.160" ID tubing functionally equivalent to the KOP tubing (or in the KOP) is prohibited for the 2011 season. This is one of those rules that is change-resistant; I would not expect it to go away for 2012. |
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
While everyone thus far is correct, please read the 2012 rules and note any changes to this part of the rules. 2012 rules will be the only ones that apply to the 2012 season.
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Last year Freelin-Wade offered a 50% discount for FIRST teams through their online store protubing.com
Here is the link to last years code. |
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Andy-Mark tubing is .17 ID are they not selling 2011 illegal tubing? There is nylon and polyethylene tubing that have better pressure ratings but, larger ID's so they also would be illegal even though they are tougher.
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
Actually, this is precisely the reason FIRST needs to specify tolerances in the rulebook. Does FIRST actually care about this difference, and how are the teams and inspectors supposed to know? The Q&A, with its delayed responses, blackout period and low readership is insufficient compared to the dead-simple alternative of Edit: Wait—why am I giving a ± tolerance? I should have recommended MAX Ø0.175 in. FIRST can't possibly care enough to intend to prevent a team from competing with undersized tubing. (That has happened; an unfortunate consequence of enforcing the rules.) |
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
As others have said, the 2011 rules may or may not apply to the 2012 rules.
However, based on my experience over the last 7 years, pneumatic tubing has been pretty much the same. 0.16 ID, 0.25 OD, 125PSI. From Mcmaster-Carr, these part numbers would be the ones to use: Opaque Black 9149T21 Opaque Blue 9149T24 Opaque Green 9149T22 Opaque White 9149T23 |
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
They are also giving a discount this year, contact them through their website and they will send you the code and also tell you the tubing specs that they supply in the past kit of parts.
|
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
Quote:
All that said, please note that the Pneumatic Tubing available on FIRST Choice does not have specs on AndyMark's website (and even the picture of the black tubing is different from that previously posted). The link to the product website specifies 14 different specs, one of which includes the 1.6" ID tubing we've had in the past. So... Everyone should just wait 4 more days before purchasing any pneumatic tubing for the season :) |
Re: Pneumatic Tubing Specs
Quote:
It wouldn't be a stretch to wonder if they might have accidentally suggested something about the 2012 KOP specs by offering non-KOP, but compatible tubing themselves. Another possibility is, as you mentioned, that they offer it independently of their FIRST offerings. (If it's not FRC-legal, the lack of a disclaimer to that effect will be less than ideal after the 2012 kickoff, given that FRC is their principal market.) In this case, you're correct that they list what appears to be the conventional Freelin-Wade KOP tubing under the FIRST Choice 2012 catalogue. (And of course none of this can easily be confirmed or dismissed until the manual is released. I'm prepared to wait.) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi