Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Drive Systems (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=99373)

LondonBoy29 07-01-2012 16:05

Drive Systems
 
What drive systems are people thinking about using for this game? It looks like a 6 wheel drive will be best (because of the barrier), but I can see ways to use a mecanum or swerve drive (using the bridge).

Frenchie461 07-01-2012 16:20

Re: Drive Systems
 
A lot of teams are going to go mecanum because of the existence of protected zone, but defense will be aggressive in preventing them from getting there.

I can see 4 wheel tank being viable due to the fact it makes getting ground clearance for the bump easier (see 330's 2010 bot) as well as working on widebody robots.

As with nearly any game, 6 wheel tank is viable and will be the most commonly used drive, and since the kitbot is 6 wheel drop center, FIRST engineers thought it could play the game.

Zoughtbaj 07-01-2012 16:32

Re: Drive Systems
 
I'm curious if anyone is going to try to build a drive train to actually circumvent the barrier. The only things I can think of to do that would be either rather large wheels or a tread drive (after actually seeing the barrier, normal wheels will likely be an "improbability" :)). Then again, the rules are strict enough in regard to passing over the balance boards (G25, G28, G29) that I doubt there will be a need to go over the barrier. Our team has been developing a 6-wheel drive system that we are pretty happy with, because of the increased mobility over the 4-wheel. However, 4-wheel drives will have a fine time navigating the field as well, I think.

tlivingd 07-01-2012 19:25

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoughtbaj (Post 1098237)
I'm curious if anyone is going to try to build a drive train to actually circumvent the barrier. The only things I can think of to do that would be either rather large wheels or a tread drive (after actually seeing the barrier, normal wheels will likely be an "improbability" :)).

Our team is thinking along the lines of above, but i'm not going to say how much of above :D

Ernst 07-01-2012 20:21

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoughtbaj (Post 1098237)
I'm curious if anyone is going to try to build a drive train to actually circumvent the barrier. The only things I can think of to do that would be either rather large wheels or a tread drive (after actually seeing the barrier, normal wheels will likely be an "improbability" :)). Then again, the rules are strict enough in regard to passing over the balance boards (G25, G28, G29) that I doubt there will be a need to go over the barrier. Our team has been developing a 6-wheel drive system that we are pretty happy with, because of the increased mobility over the 4-wheel. However, 4-wheel drives will have a fine time navigating the field as well, I think.

I've come up with about 5 or 6 different ways to climb over the 4 inch tall barrier. Are the biggest wheels allowed this year 8 inches? I couldn't find anything in the "The Robot" section of the manual. If so, then I instantly have another half dozen solutions.

Andrew Lawrence 07-01-2012 20:22

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoughtbaj (Post 1098237)
I'm curious if anyone is going to try to build a drive train to actually circumvent the barrier. The only things I can think of to do that would be either rather large wheels or a tread drive (after actually seeing the barrier, normal wheels will likely be an "improbability" :)). Then again, the rules are strict enough in regard to passing over the balance boards (G25, G28, G29) that I doubt there will be a need to go over the barrier. Our team has been developing a 6-wheel drive system that we are pretty happy with, because of the increased mobility over the 4-wheel. However, 4-wheel drives will have a fine time navigating the field as well, I think.

We have a way through them. :) How? Watch SVR in 11 weeks and find out!

EricH 07-01-2012 20:23

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ZehP (Post 1098520)
I've come up with about 5 or 6 different ways to climb over the 4 inch tall barrier. Are the biggest wheels allowed this year 8 inches? I couldn't find anything in the "The Robot" section of the manual. If so, then I instantly have another half dozen solutions.

If you can't find a rule restricting wheels, then wheels should be considered unrestricted. Have at it.

You could always ask the GDC to be certain, but I can only think of one wheel restriction rule (back in '09).

Ninja_Bait 07-01-2012 20:34

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LondonBoy29 (Post 1098198)
What drive systems are people thinking about using for this game? It looks like a 6 wheel drive will be best (because of the barrier), but I can see ways to use a mecanum or swerve drive (using the bridge).

Our team is also coming up with ways to jump the bump, but I'm actually surprised that people think mecanum will be used by a lot of teams. HDPE floors? Bumps? Bridges? Those will not be nice to your poor Swiss wheels.

Andrew Lawrence 07-01-2012 20:37

Re: Drive Systems
 
Have 2 pneumatic cylinders between the front and middle wheels, pointing down. Then, at the press of a button, the shoot out for a second and come back in, lifting your robot into the air, and giving it room to get over the bump.

Ninja_Bait 07-01-2012 20:40

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperNerd256 (Post 1098558)
Have 2 pneumatic cylinders between the front and middle wheels, pointing down. Then, at the press of a button, the shoot out for a second and come back in, lifting your robot into the air, and giving it room to get over the bump.

Who are you, Speed Racer? Do you also have cutter blades, a bulletproof canopy and a homing pigeon? Oh no, the homing pigeon is like a minibot! Arrrrrrghfuuuuuu!

pfreivald 07-01-2012 20:46

Re: Drive Systems
 
I think octocanum with barrier assist sounds about right for this one... :D

Gdeaver 07-01-2012 20:48

Re: Drive Systems
 
Wouldn't lifting the robot violate the bumper height rule?

akoscielski3 07-01-2012 20:51

Re: Drive Systems
 
I wondering how people are expecting to get the Bridge down from its nuteul position. Any thoughts??

davidthefat 07-01-2012 20:53

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by akoscielski3 (Post 1098596)
I wondering how people are expecting to get the Bridge down from its nuteul position. Any thoughts??

Little t-rex arms in the front of the robot.

Daniel_LaFleur 07-01-2012 20:54

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gdeaver (Post 1098586)
Wouldn't lifting the robot violate the bumper height rule?

Depends on how high you lift the chassis.

Also, you'd need to be careful of 'articulating' bumpers.

cricket66 07-01-2012 20:54

Re: Drive Systems
 
What is the bumper height restriction this year. I see nothing in the specs.

tlivingd 07-01-2012 21:03

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cricket66 (Post 1098603)
What is the bumper height restriction this year. I see nothing in the specs.

R01, blue box


[R01] see the whole rule as trimmed for content......... The Frame Perimeter of a Robot is defined by the outer-most set of exterior verticies on the Robot that are within the Bumper Zone, which is between 2 and 10 in. from the floor. Minor protrusions no greater than ¼ in. such as bolt heads, fastener ends, and rivets are not considered part of the Frame Perimeter.

To determine the Frame Perimeter, wrap a piece of string around the Robot at the level described in [R02]. The string describes this polygon.

Note: to permit a simplified definition of the Frame Perimeter and encourage a tight, robust connection between the Bumpers and the Frame Perimeter, minor protrusions such as bolt heads, fastener ends, rivets, etc are excluded from the determination of the Frame Perimeter.



Why this isn't in the bumper section i'll never know.

EDIT: Howdy neighbor! :-)

tlivingd 07-01-2012 21:06

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur (Post 1098601)
Depends on how high you lift the chassis.

Also, you'd need to be careful of 'articulating' bumpers.

Please see:
[R30]
Bumpers may not be articulated.

Daniel_LaFleur 07-01-2012 21:07

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tlivingd (Post 1098626)
Please see:
[R30]
Bumpers may not be articulated.

Exactly why I mentioned it ;)

Grim Tuesday 07-01-2012 21:43

Re: Drive Systems
 
May our 14" mechanism expand in the bumper zone outside the robot?

Steven Donow 07-01-2012 21:50

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday (Post 1098706)
May our 14" mechanism expand in the bumper zone outside the robot?

I would assume so. My POV regarding this is that the bumper zone is only a bumper zone when there are bumpers present. That sounds a bit confusing, but what I'm saying is, you have your bumpers set with the openings, then you have an arm(or whatever) at the same level as your bumpers, then yes, its seems like you can expand there(if that's what you're asking)

joek 07-01-2012 21:50

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ninja_Bait (Post 1098552)
Our team is also coming up with ways to jump the bump, but I'm actually surprised that people think mecanum will be used by a lot of teams. HDPE floors? Bumps? Bridges? Those will not be nice to your poor Swiss wheels.

their actually one of, if not the strongest wheels out there (an aluminum and steel sandwich). that said, you probably should use hard rubber rollers, as the soft one might get chewed up. also, u will want 10", because the boards are 4" high...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur (Post 1098629)
Exactly why I mentioned it ;)

they never said that the part their attached to can't move...

pfreivald 07-01-2012 21:50

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gdeaver (Post 1098586)
Wouldn't lifting the robot violate the bumper height rule?

I don't think so -- any more than driving across a tilted ramp would violate the bumper height rule. The bumper height is clearly relative to the robot, and not to the absolute plane of the court floor, else any ramp action is inherently illegal.

Andrew Zeller 07-01-2012 23:06

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoughtbaj (Post 1098237)
I'm curious if anyone is going to try to build a drive train to actually circumvent the barrier. The only things I can think of to do that would be either rather large wheels or a tread drive (after actually seeing the barrier, normal wheels will likely be an "improbability" :)). Then again, the rules are strict enough in regard to passing over the balance boards (G25, G28, G29) that I doubt there will be a need to go over the barrier. Our team has been developing a 6-wheel drive system that we are pretty happy with, because of the increased mobility over the 4-wheel. However, 4-wheel drives will have a fine time navigating the field as well, I think.

hmmm.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MgdG...eature=related

Grim Tuesday 07-01-2012 23:15

Re: Drive Systems
 
Team 610 in 2010 had ~10" pneumatic wheeled 6WD; the middle one rose and lowered so that they had an easier time with the bump. I'll try to find a video, but most of them are low res taken from far away. Anyone have a picture of it? Still my favorite robot of all time.

Starke 07-01-2012 23:19

Re: Drive Systems
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday (Post 1098881)
Team 610 in 2010 had ~10" pneumatic wheeled 6WD; the middle one rose and lowered so that they had an easier time with the bump. I'll try to find a video, but most of them are low res taken from far away. Anyone have a picture of it? Still my favorite robot of all time.

Done.


http://frc-designs.com/html/CAD_2010.html



Flimsor 08-01-2012 01:46

Re: Drive Systems
 
This was posted in a different forum. It's a really cool way to drive the robot, but i'm not completely sure how effective it would be for this years game.

http://youtu.be/uaT7M3Nwj7c


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi