![]() |
Shooting from opposite side of the field
After hearing the balls were foam, I was worried about how they would handle being launched with air resistance (as a foamy ball would barley go anywhere, like throwing a un-crumpled piece of paper). After I got my hands on one though, it seems a lot better then I thought it would be.
Anyway, my question would be do you think a shooter powerful enough to score from the other side of the field (or up against the bump on the other side, at least) be possible? and is scoring from the other side allowed? (I saw nothing in the rules) |
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
Yes, I believe it is possible. However, to actually score, I believe it is a one in a thousand chance.
|
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
I think you'll see very competitive teams do it, yes.
|
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
I ran some quick calculations, and in order to score from an opposite corner, the ball would need to have an exit velocity of about 42 feet/second at a 45* angle.
|
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
Quote:
What formulas did you use? And thanks! |
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
|
don't know how accurate your estimation will be. at 42 feet per second (12m/s) initial you will run into about 1.2 Newton of drag force.. which translates to approximately 3.5m/s^2 of initial deceleration.
|
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
Quote:
|
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
I've been doing some math, and 6inches from the edge and 6 inches from the very far back wall of the lane, it's a 55.0568foot shot to the goal, not including the distance for an angle to the top of the goal. The extra distance it has to go, assuming the cannon/turret is at the very top of the 60" limit, is negligible (About an inch or so). At any rate, a 55 foot shot is going to be quite difficult.From the research I've just been doing, it's 42' to half court, then you'd add another 13' to that.
|
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
Look at the Peguineers robots from 2006.
|
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
On a less scientific note, I do remember nearly being pegged in the face in 2006 by an over propelled poof ball (I kept wondering why it was getting bigger and bigger...) while standing past the driver wall. While not quite the same as the basketballs this year, they can carry for some distance.
|
I don't think that's possible this year.. in order for this thing to go far, it needs to be at 45 degrees and have a really fast speed.. with this weight... any speed above 15m/s will slow down very quickly..
will mock up a simulation in the morning in python with an iterative estimator |
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
Ran through Wikipedia and Google quickly and came up with this:
Drag force = (1/2) * p * v^2 * CoD * A
Drag force = (1/2) * 1.204 kg/m^3 * (12.8016 m/s)^2 * 0.4 * 0.0162146393 m^2 = 2.010 Newtons (approx. 0.452 pounds). Fairly negligible if my math is right. Mathematically, you could figure out how much force is needed to have the ball travel at a speed without regarding drag, then just tack the drag force onto that. Making something to force a ball to go at that speed will be hard, though. EDIT1: Fixed a stupid math error (00:49) EDIT2: Check out this post on drag etc. (01:13) |
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
Quote:
|
Re: Shooting from opposite side of the field
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi