|
Re: Coopertition points for borrowing minibot
My guess is that this "borrowing" of minibots are a result of not enough kits (or cost is too high) to give to each team, given that not all teams would make one anyway.
However, making it into a game incentive to let other teams borrow, I'd agree with Ed on this one. If a team cant even create a minibot for an event, there is almost no chance they'll come with a deployment system.
I dont know about you guys, but to me, the deployment system integrated with your tube scoring bot is a lot more difficult than making the minibot itself, given the constraints this year.
My guess is that we wont have more than 1 or 2 teams per tournament (most likely none) that can accept someone elses minibot successfully..............other than the collaborating teams with duplicate bots. 
__________________
2016 Hawaii Regional #1 seed, IDesign, Safety Award
2016 NY Tech Valley Regional Champions, #1 seed, Innovation in Controls Award
2016 Lake Superior Regional Champions, #1 seed, Quality Award, Dean's List
2015 FRC Worlds-Carver Division Champions
2015 Hawaii Regional Champions, #1 seed.
2015 Australia Regional Champions, #2 seed, Engineering Excellence Award
2015 Inland Empire Regional Champions, #1 seed, Industrial Design Award
2014 OZARK Mountain Brawl Champions, #1 seed.
2014 Hawaii Regional Champions, #1 seed, UL Safety Award
2014 Dallas Regional Champions, #1 seed, Engineering Excellence Award
2014 Northern Lights Regional Champions, #1 seed, Entrepreneurship Award
2013 Championship Dean's List Winner
2013 Utah Regional Champion, #1 seed, KP&B Award, Deans List
2013 Boilermaker Regional Champion, #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
2012 Lone Star Regional Champion, #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
2012 Hawaii Regional Champions #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
|