View Single Post
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2011, 21:20
Mr.G Mr.G is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kevin
FRC #0326 (Xtreme Eagles / Romulus High School / General Motors)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Romulus
Posts: 244
Mr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond reputeMr.G has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Mr.G
Re: pic: Legal Frame ????????????????

It doesn't say the string has to be taught.....You could pull the string around the robot much like a seamstress would use a measuring tape to measure in their job. I took the string as more like a level line.

It is the exterior vertices part that means you can't have inside corners.

Not to argue this anymore, but this is just a badly written rule. It would be much better to just say "inside corners are not allowed"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
A string wrapped around the robot at the height of the bumper zone would bridge the opening and therefore require bumpers attached to the robot everywhere the string exists. I failed a "T" design last year for the violation. I explained the rule and assisted the team in becoming compliant. As they were under size and underweight and had time to complete the needed mods, they played. In light of other game rules, (cough herding cough) it is easy to see why the FRAME PERIMETER is so defined.
Reply With Quote