View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 10:47
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,034
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another chapter to the 6WD vs. Mecanum debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCH95 View Post
Because a mecanum drive has less total usable force at any given speed than a 6wd, and power = force * speed, does this not mean that mecanum drive has less available power than a 6wd?
Yes. But that's a power limit, not a power loss. This may seem like nitpicking, but it's an important distinction.

Quote:
If my interpretation is correct (please correct me if I'm wrong), the power loss in mecanum comes from the force vector cancellation during straight-line driving, not from frictional losses in the rollers.
The "force vector cancellation" does not cause any power loss unless you are operating on a very resilient surface at high vehicle force levels and speeds. And then it's not a fixed 30% number but rather a function of the force and speed.

Once a mecanum's wheels break traction (start slipping), then any additional power supplied to the motors is wasted in scrubbing the wheels on the floor.


Reply With Quote