View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2011, 20:33
gbrettmiller's Avatar
gbrettmiller gbrettmiller is offline
Registered User
AKA: Brett
FRC #2893 (The Robohobos)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 53
gbrettmiller is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to gbrettmiller
Re: R22 and previous year's designs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Dillard View Post
Yes, but the definition refers to the fabricated part (it says component or mechanism) not the design. The part is not COTS, period. But it doesn't say that the design had to come from a vendor - if they got it from a professional publication it didn't necessarily come from a vendor. Example 2 says "openly available blueprints". There is no distinction on who generated the design.
From example 3:

Quote:
The design drawings would be considered a COTS item.
This to me means that the design itself would have to meet the criteria given in the definition of COTS, which include being provided by a VENDOR.
__________________
- - -- --- -----
Brett Miller
Mentor - FIRST 2893
gbrettmiller@gmail.com
240.428.8476
----- --- -- - -