View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2011, 00:19
normalmutant's Avatar
normalmutant normalmutant is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nathan
FTC #3539 (Say Watt?)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 126
normalmutant has a spectacular aura aboutnormalmutant has a spectacular aura about
Post Re: [FTC]: FTC Rules Question

This has been posted on the forum a lot already:
http://ftcforum.usfirst.org/showthre...me-Definitions
Read posts #5, #7, and #24 (pg. 3). These are the main ones that refer to goal possession other than the definition itself.
But, as you can see in the attached image in #24, you can constrain it on three sides. But the goal must have a way to separate from the robot (and vice versa) without excessive friction. The refs judge what is considered excessive friction.

However, in end game, you can possess the goal or lift, grasp, hold, etc (on 4 sides, if you want).

If you look at our robots on youtube, you'll see why we know the goal possession rules backward and forward. ...Well, it's been worth it so far. Hope this helps.
__________________
SAY-WATT.ORG
Reply With Quote