View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-01-2011, 04:16
techhelpbb's Avatar
techhelpbb techhelpbb is offline
Registered User
FRC #0011 (MORT - Team 11)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,620
techhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jaguar Speed Control Only Reaches 50% of Setpoint

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
I've never heard of such a thing. It would seem to defeat the whole purpose of the integral controller.

I suspect what they are hoping to communicate would be to eliminate noise induced run away. If you get noise that interferes with your return function then over a duration then...for example...you might end up 'winding up' the I in such a way that even though you've limited it...it's still way too high and because of it getting to high over and over from disturbance and noise it may never come down and the result might be perceived as erratic movement.

If you can 'reset' the I (not necessarily make the I constant 0), and do it when the I is perceived to have 'wound up' too often, then you can effectively prevent yourself from having to reset the entire PID loop to eliminate what appears to be erratic function.

As an example...
http://community.mybb.com/thread-78886.html
Reply With Quote