View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-02-2011, 09:58
PhilBot's Avatar
PhilBot PhilBot is offline
Get a life? This IS my life!
AKA: Phil Malone
FRC #1629 (GaCo: The Garrett Coalition)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 744
PhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond repute
Why are Limit Switches outlawed with PWM, but not CAN?

Can anyone explain the logic of <R55>- J to me?
If CAN-bus functionality is used, limit switch jumpers may be removed from a Jaguar speed controller and a custom limit switch circuit may be substituted (so that the cRIO-FRC may read the status of the limit switches).
I know that when using PWM to control the Victors, the Limit Switche inputs automatically stop the motors in either direction when the a switch is tripped (discovered by accident). This seems like a GREAT safety feature.

But these jaguar -connected switches are only permitted when using CAN.

The rule "looks" like it's permitting the use of limit switches with CAN ONLY to enable the cRIO to read them. Does this mean that when using CAN, the switches don't actually stop the motors automatically?

If they do stop the motors, it seems like permitting their use with PWM would also make sense.

Phil.
__________________
Phil Malone
Garrett Engineering And Robotics Society (GEARS) founder.
http://www.GEARSinc.org

FRC1629 Mentor, FTC2818 Coach, FTC4240 Mentor, FLL NeXTGEN Mentor
Reply With Quote