View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-02-2011, 23:32
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,326
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Low weight we can bring to the event

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitneylion452 View Post
It seems like what you start with is what you have to stay with for the most part. I take this to mean that you can't build an entirely new mechanism.
The definition of UPGRADED parts makes me belief you can build a box bot in 6 weeks and then bring in an arm built after week 1 competitions that "adds to existing functionality...not currently available on the robot".


I personally don't like how teams can completely change their robot after seeing a dominate design. I understand continous improvement, but I don't like how it cheapens the 6 week build season. I don't have to like the rule to take advantage of it, though.