View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2011, 10:57
martin417's Avatar
martin417 martin417 is offline
Opinionated old goat
AKA: Martin Wilson
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 720
martin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: GDC cylinder answer on Q&A

Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrel View Post
If there is an orifice on one of the openings on the cylinder, then it could act as a spring, and exceed the rated pressure.
But flow control fittings are legal, and have been included in the KOP in the past (see 2008 SMC parts, flow control fittings NAS2201F-N01_07S) Again, if the team in question were to hook up the blind end of the cylinder to the normally open side of a legal pneumatic valve through a legal flow control fitting, they would achieve the same result. If they choose not to activate that valve, there is no rule to prohibit this use.

If the GDC had explained the ruling by citing the rule that prohibits the design as they see it, the team could clarify, or modify their design to be legal. My biggest complaint is the lack of clarity and completeness in the answer.
__________________
Former Mentor Team 1771
Former mentor Team 4509

Last edited by martin417 : 09-02-2011 at 12:54.
Reply With Quote