View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2011, 13:03
D.Allred's Avatar
D.Allred D.Allred is offline
Registered User
FRC #4451 (Rat Rod Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 210
D.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond repute
Re: GDC cylinder answer on Q&A

Martin,
As you pointed, it would have been nice if the GDC would stated which rule applied. The user had specifically asked if a cylinder (they used the term piston) could be used as a shock absorber without being

R66J defines a cylinder as a pneumatic component.
R70A defines that all working pneumatic components must be connected to the working pressure side of the pneumatic system.

I was wondering why someone would want to do this. I believe Chuck answered that question for me in the previous post. I do believe using an independent cylinder with restricters would violate R70A.

I guess the GDC left us guessing on this one.
Reply With Quote