View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-02-2011, 01:09
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Effective way to rank minibots?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Basel A View Post
but I think placing will work just as well with all minibots, whereas estimation won't work as well with the fastest (but perhaps better with the worst).
Thats a good point. I think you get to a point where minibots are "fast enough", especially at the regional level. Is there really a significant difference between 1.55 second and 2 seconds? Or 2 seconds and 3 seconds? I don't think so, especially considering there are many factors that prevent teams from deploying at the exact same millisecond.

Thus, I think it is important to rank the lower end minibots, which may range from 8-14 seconds. That time difference is probably more significance.
Reply With Quote