View Single Post
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-02-2011, 11:59
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,757
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: LogoMotion Learnings from Scrimmages

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikesrock View Post
I read that to mean that the narrowest part (ie. the middle of a triangle edge) of a properly inflated tube should be between 7 and 8 inches, I certainly could be wrong though. If that triangle didn't even fit through the feeding slot as was reported don't you think it may have been on the large side?
If the narrowest portion was 7-8", the widest portion could be more than 10" (the height of the slot).

It would have been larger than most tubes, but without measurement of the narrow section, we wouldn't know if it was out of spec.
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote