Thread: 84" zone
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2011, 12:53
thefro526's Avatar
thefro526 thefro526 is offline
Mentor for Hire.
AKA: Dustin Benedict
no team (EWCP, MAR, FRC 708)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,599
thefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to thefro526 Send a message via MSN to thefro526
Re: 84" zone

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonRotolo View Post

And don't for a moment think that the inspectors won't mention to the referees on the field the fact that when your arm is horizontal it exceeds 84".
I just want to expand on Don's Comment a bit, just in case other people come in with similar questions.

Usually, in years where there is a maximum size constraint, you will be asked during the inspection process if you can exceed this dimension, and will be tested to see if you can exceed this dimension. If you are able to expand beyond this dimension, the inspectors will usually note under what circumstances you can expand and pass this information onto the referees.

Personally, we can theoretically expand beyond 84" when our arm is parallel with the ground and our mini-bot deployment system is activated. Knowing this, we plan on implementing a software safety that prevents us from deploying our mini-bot while the arm is not in the home position. I would suggest that all other teams implement something similar to avoid unnecessary penalties.
__________________
-Dustin Benedict
2005-2012 - Student & Mentor FRC 816
2012-2014 - Technical Mentor, 2014 Drive Coach FRC 341
Current - Mentor FRC 2729, FRC 708