View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-02-2011, 15:43
Bob Steele's Avatar
Bob Steele Bob Steele is offline
Professional Steamacrit Hunter
AKA: Bob Steele
FRC #1983 (Skunk Works Robotics)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,528
Bob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bag and Tag issues?

Communicating correctly is always difficult.
Case in point...

The poll above... what does it mean... and how do you answer it?

Bumpers one in bag

Does this mean "none" in bag...or "on" in bag?

If I interpret it bumpers on in bag then I say yes
and the "uh,oh, I am scared now, Help" statement does not make sense...

and the "all set to go" is ambigious...all set to include them as half of my 30 lbs with holding allowance.. or actually more like ALL of the withholding allowance. (2 pairs at 15 lbs + each..)

If I interpret it as NONE in bag.... then it makes sense...

The omission or addition of one little letter leads to ambiguous interpretation...

I have to agree that bumpers should have been excluded from the withholding allowance...and allowed to be unbagged...

This is the first time for many of us to experience the bag procedure... putting them in the bag loose (so that the robot can easily fit through a 30" door...) can lead to them bumping around and breaking something else...especially with 2 sets of them...it also makes the already difficult job of carrying the robot...(with slippery plastic on it) even more difficult and unsafe.

For so many of us that have always crated before it had never been an issue. You could put bumpers in the crate with little thought to the safety issues of trying to carry the robot about with an enormous plastic bag on it.

This is a situation where the GDC or Bill should come down and say it was ok to not have the bumpers on the robot. AND that they don't count towards the withholding allowance.

I know that the question was asked in Q and A but I am not sure if anyone was thinking about the safety issues.

I would hope that they re-examine this issue and clarify it before the first competition...

Let's be safe... let's recognize that the rules may have not stated things explicitly... and let's play robots...

(By the way, our team recognized this in advance and our bumpers are in our bag...on the robot...and we are all set to go...... and I voted yes above...)
__________________
Raisbeck Aviation High School TEAM 1983 - Seattle, Washington
Las Vegas 07 WINNER w/ 1425/254...Seattle 08 WINNER w/ 2046/949.. Oregon 09 WINNER w/1318/2635..SEA 10 RCA ..Spokane 12 WINNER w/2122/4082 and RCA...Central Wa 13 WINNER w/1425/753..Seattle 13 WINNER w/948/492 & RCA ..Spokane 13 WINNER w/2471/4125.. Spokane 14 - DCA --Auburn 14 - WINNER w/1318/4960..District CMP 14 WINNER w/1318/2907, District CMA.. CMP 14 Newton Finalist w 971/341/3147 ... Auburn Mountainview 15 WINNER w/1318/3049 - Mt Vernon 15 WINNER w/1318/4654 - Philomath 15 WINNER w/955/847 -District CMP 15 WINNER w/955/2930 & District CMA -CMP Newton -Industrial Design Award


Last edited by Bob Steele : 24-02-2011 at 15:57.
Reply With Quote