Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery
Some people are just a bit eager to "contribute." Information is worthless without context. We don't have that context yet. The information being outputted now is just going to make this thread messy and harder to distinguish the useful information.
|
^ agree ^
If I'm not in a week 1 regional, and all I have is the data from FRC-Spy (for example) then I think I'd rather pick a category of analysis that would better benefit me than "who has the high score". For example, I might watch the NJ Regional scores of the 4 (5?) teams that are coming to the DC regional. Or I might watch to see teams who have good minibots and how they use them (so far 148 hasn't had a climb yet, 1:14PM). Another interesting note is that (from glancing over) about half of the matches have several penalties in them.
"High Score" allows for bragging rights, but that's about it.
Though I do admit, it feels really nice when the high score for a regional belongs to an alliance you were part of
