Quote:
Originally Posted by lineskier
you see major point inflation when you include the finals.
not sure which is better for a top 25...
theres one thing thats still for sure, 217 is a monster
this is including elims...
217 91.9375
2056 86.3750
148 85.1429
1676 79.9286
16 77.3571
2016 77.0000
33 73.6111
1126 72.7500
1519 68.2143
303 68.1538
40 67.3529
176 67.0000
340 66.4667
131 66.1765
25 61.5000
1923 61.3000
1518 60.8824
175 60.2000
2137 58.2778
191 58.0833
1918 56.3333
229 54.7692
118 54.6154
3074 53.9231
156 53.9000
138 53.8889
1218 53.3333
2228 53.2000
811 52.8462
69 52.3636
|
Yes. There is an issue with including elims. The second alliance pick. As an example, 303 was a good enough scorer, but we (1676/2016/303) used them as a defender and they jumped from off the list to 10th on the list due to the alliance score in elims. Not really in the spirit of what you are trying to accomplish with this list.
There is value in what you are doing with this data. Thank you for sharing. I am not the kind of guy to do the full research on 25+ teams to submit a fully proper entry, but using your analysis as a starting point I may feel confident enough to submit an entry. Maybe after I see data for week 2 as well.