Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector MycroftH
The average may have differed greatly but there are different ways this data may be perceived. It could mean that the teams were "weaker" or that they were better balanced with respect to one another.
Like you stated, the strategies at the regionals varied and the presence of tubes from both alliances in a central location compared to that of playing conservatively will result in different results.
There is a thread about the highest score that refers to 148 and their partners scoring 135, but the opposing alliance with only a mere 8. Compare that to the first finals match at GSR with 117 over 82 and you see more of a balance. What were some of the finals scores at FLR,Alamo, NJ, and Kettering? I'd like to see some of the results.
|
the top NJ score:
red score:124 blue score:22 red :1860 25 1923 blue: 1089 1647 102 red mini:50 blue mini: 0
top alamo:
red score:135 bluescore: 37 red: 3481 16 148 blue: 57 2848 245 red mini:50 blue mini:25
kettering
red score:114 blue score:79 red: 2137 33 1 blue: 326 67 3322 red mini:50 blue mini:15