View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-03-2011, 00:37
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,664
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Take the "Bane" out of your Banebot P60s - Solution to Banebot P60 Weaknesses

Jason,

I don't think I specifically declared it above, but our arm design is fairly well inside BB's 35 ft-lb spec at about 8 ft-lbs, and we're still slowly failing our gearbox due to the shock loading I mentioned above. Yes, as an engineer I should've realized this was a possibility and demanded more than a 4:1 margin in the system. Still, BB's warning there doesn't really go nearly far enough. It's not that you have to limit the torque IF your motor-gearbox combo can exceed 35 ft-lbs. You have to limit torque if the load can exert more than 35 ft-lbs on the shaft. I think you could actually fail the gearboxes without a motor attached to them at all, in fact. So your only real option for using them safely as they come is to put a torque limiter on the output shaft and hope for the best.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
Reply With Quote