Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor
It is my hope that this gives us a more holistic picture of the spread of FRC teams. Before we start assigning "good" "better" and "best" it'd be a good idea to determine what exactly we mean as "region" and whether it is classified by pure geography or by team saturation.
|
Well, I think we can keep the regions how they are, but instead, look at it percentage-wise.
So for instance, lets say 10 solid teams are in region x, and 1 team that is the best in the history of FIRST is in region y. Percentage wise, you could argue that that region Y is better, or vice versa. So i guess, look at it that way
Remember, its 90% opinion, 10% educated observation.