View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-03-2011, 10:48
ebarker's Avatar
ebarker ebarker is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ed Barker
FRC #1311 (Kell Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Kennesaw GA
Posts: 1,437
ebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond reputeebarker has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The law of un-intended consequences: rule re-interpretation

There was an amendment to <R72> here: http://usfirst.org/uploadedFiles/Rob...Update%205.pdf

that allowed the use of an inexpensive relief valve on the low 60 psi side of the circuit to relieve the requirement for an expensive solenoid valve.

In other words you can you a $ 40 solenoid valve in conjunction with a relief valve.
__________________
Ed Barker