Thread: Team Update #18
View Single Post
  #259   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-03-2011, 23:20
Ian Curtis Ian Curtis is offline
Best Available Data
FRC #1778 (Chill Out!)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2,521
Ian Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team Update #18

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karthik View Post
Be careful to paint both teams with the same brush stroke. Mark made a specific description of 190's deployment which made Paul think it's illegal, namely the creation of potential energy by the downward movement along the track. From my understanding, Pink's ramp only goes upward, meaning the track (and thus the hostbot) would not be contributing any energy.
As a devil's advocate, I'm still not sure even that is legal. <G19> specifically says "...solely through electric energy provided after the start of DEPLOYMENT by the permitted..." As the 190 design has the robot accelerating through electrical energy prior to deployment (crossing the plane of the base) I could see the argument that they are storing "non-incidental" kinetic energy in their minibot. Probably the only way to get the real answer is the Q&A. Does 233 start their minibot within the base? I'm pretty sure 190's did not.

It wouldn't be an FRC game if 190 didn't do something that CD could argue the legality of for entirely too many posts!
__________________
CHILL OUT! | Aero Stability & Control Engineer
Adam Savage's Obsessions (TED Talk) (Part 2)
It is much easier to call someone else a genius than admit to yourself that you are lazy. - Dave Gingery
Reply With Quote