View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-03-2011, 00:01
mwibbels's Avatar
mwibbels mwibbels is offline
Registered User
FRC #2122 (Team Tators)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 77
mwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond reputemwibbels has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Seattle Cascade tubes.

Personally would appreciate it if FIRST would set an expectation that the tubes would have a mean of 7" for the body of the triangles and an mean of 8" for the body of the squares and circles.

I think that this could minimize the general tendency to inflate and compress with the C's- which generally renders the spec as it is currently being implemented fairly meaningless. In addition, I personally think this type of expectation would be more consistent with what was the more common reading of the tube size rules.
Reply With Quote