Thread: Team Update #18
View Single Post
  #268   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-03-2011, 00:24
jspatz1's Avatar
jspatz1 jspatz1 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jeff
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 836
jspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to jspatz1
Re: Team Update #18

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomergeek View Post
...move up the POST solely through electric energy provided after the start of DEPLOYMENT by the permitted, unaltered battery and converted to mechanical energy by the permitted unaltered motors...

As long as gravitational potential lost plus gravitational potential gained is zero or negative below the deployment line- it provides NO ENERGY "to move up the POST". All energy is coming from the batteries/motors- but the allowed advantage for the rampbot is that its battery/motors energy expended as soon as it crosses into the deployment cylinder can be transferred through any shape ramp into vertical motion up the pole.
I envisioned from some of the descriptions a ramp with a net downward slope that allowed the bot to gain momentum from elevation change. If instead you are saying that the minibot gains momentum between the deployment cylinder and the pole by simply using its own motors to get a "head start" and then the track directs this momentum upward, then I would say that is legal, and a clever idea.
__________________
Reply With Quote