Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
Potential reasons:
1. Because they don't have someone who understands Physics leading the design.
2. Because they don't read Chief Delphi
3. Because they are ignorant of the world around them.
I don't mean this post to be harsh. I lot of teams have put a lot of work into some very successful larger minibots. But as a matter of engineering and physics principals, a small and light one is the only correct way to do it, if the goal is to get to the top the fastest.
|
I normally respect your opinion but let's look at engineering and physics for a minute...
How many of those "small and light" minibots are using limit switches rated for AC only? Answer: All of them.
From an engineering perspective, this is reckless and stupid. AC current switches through zero 120 times a second and the arc created when one tries to open a circuit is extinguished.
This does not happen for a DC current. It is much harder to switch... The arc tries to bridge the gap resulting in contact pitting and/or welding. This arcing becomes even larger when switching inductive loads (like DC motors).
To pick an example, the Honeywell microswitch in the KOP is rated for 11 amps AC only. An electrical engineer would never use it for DC currents except at milliamp (logic signal) levels. And in the extreme cases where expected lifetime is measured in thousands of cycles, never at all...
Now, you can specify DC rated microswitches but they ain't so micro...
So... We have teams who use NXT controllers and NXT touch sensors and they end up with large, non-competitive but better engineered minibots. And then we have poorly engineered but competitive minibots whose mentors have turned a blind eye to good engineering and are just hoping that they get though the season without failures setting in.
The correct way is not necessarily the competitive way...
Just who is ignorant of physics or of the world around them?
Regards,
Mike