Quote:
Originally Posted by lineskier
again please disprove these claims but:
2054 and 67 had the 2 best robots or most reliable robots
1918 was very good or very reliable
74 was good and reliable
now these statements may be wrong, I'm looking for insights on them  |
67's auton was very good (15/18), with twice being knocked off track by partners.
67 scored on average ~6.5 tubes/match.
67's minibot was very reliable and fast, as long as the drive team gave the minibot the respect it deserved.
2054 had an absolutely spot on autonomous in every match.
2054 scored on average ~3.5 tubes/match.
2054's minibot was very dependable, launching almost every match for 1st or 2nd place (have to check the data we have to be certain).
1918 auton was 50/50
1918 scored ~4.5 tubes/match. Capable of putting up 9 if given the chance. Had a couple of cRIO issues during qualifications and one match were a tube got stuck on their robot, so they couldn't score anymore.
1918 had troubles launching their minibot in early matches, seemed to get better as the competition went on. Very fast minibot...probably close to 2054 and 67 in raw speed, but slower in deployment.
74 was basically a clone of 2054....very dependable, very reliable. But, they worked up to that reliability quickly Friday morning.
27 was basically the same as 1918. Very good scorer (very dangerous if left alone), but had some arm issues in qualifications. Auton was spotty. Minibot was really good... I think they did not launch twice the entire weekend.
I will try to pull the data for these teams and calculate the final numbers. By far the top 5 teams at the competition.
226, 1718, and 2000 were the other teams that were pretty strong too.