View Single Post
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-03-2011, 11:00
mwtidd's Avatar
mwtidd mwtidd is offline
Registered User
AKA: mike
FRC #0319 (Big Bad Bob)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 714
mwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond reputemwtidd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Top 25 ETCs after Week 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Freeman View Post
67's auton was very good (15/18), with twice being knocked off track by partners.
67 scored on average ~6.5 tubes/match.
67's minibot was very reliable and fast, as long as the drive team gave the minibot the respect it deserved.

2054 had an absolutely spot on autonomous in every match.
2054 scored on average ~3.5 tubes/match.
2054's minibot was very dependable, launching almost every match for 1st or 2nd place (have to check the data we have to be certain).

1918 auton was 50/50
1918 scored ~4.5 tubes/match. Capable of putting up 9 if given the chance. Had a couple of cRIO issues during qualifications and one match were a tube got stuck on their robot, so they couldn't score anymore.
1918 had troubles launching their minibot in early matches, seemed to get better as the competition went on. Very fast minibot...probably close to 2054 and 67 in raw speed, but slower in deployment.

74 was basically a clone of 2054....very dependable, very reliable. But, they worked up to that reliability quickly Friday morning.

27 was basically the same as 1918. Very good scorer (very dangerous if left alone), but had some arm issues in qualifications. Auton was spotty. Minibot was really good... I think they did not launch twice the entire weekend.

I will try to pull the data for these teams and calculate the final numbers. By far the top 5 teams at the competition.

226, 1718, and 2000 were the other teams that were pretty strong too.
Thanks!

and its pretty cool cause if you look at ETC for those last 3:

226- 15
1718- 15
2000- 14

It seems down matches really kill teams. Teams with a high ETC are essentially reliable every qualifying match or are really really good (having to make up for a zero is not easy).

2054 had a robot score of 25 where you had a robot score of 20. The difference there was probably the autonomous. I tried to get first to include autonomous in the tweet... maybe next year.

I'm going to try to figure out how the race was actually finished. Its entirely possible to figure out which alliance finished in which places, and then use that to predict who finished in which position for each team.
__________________
"Never let your schooling interfere with your education" -Mark Twain
Reply With Quote