Thread: Bumper Inspection Discrepency
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-03-2011, 17:22
Gary Dillard's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Gary Dillard Gary Dillard is offline
Generator of Entropy
AKA: you know, the old bald guy
FRC #2973 (The Mad Rockers)
Team Role: Engineer
  
Join Date: Nov 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 1,582
Gary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Gary Dillard
Re: Bumper Inspection Discrepency
I can't tell you about this year but if I understand what you are describing, they would be illegal this year for the same reason they were illegal last year.

If you check the Q&A's, if something is legal by one rule but illegal by another rule, then the more restrictive (illegal) rule takes precedence. In this case the 1 inch extension for R07 "L" may be OK, but the more restrictive Joints between BUMPER segments and the radial projections of corners must be filled with “soft” BUMPER materials. from R07 "C" takes precedence (emphasis mine).
__________________
Close enough to taste it, too far to reach it