Quote:
Originally Posted by fox46
Well I agree with you in that I hope they were referring to the first question regarding the PowerSonics but I did indeed post two questions. The second part contained in the last paragraph was:
This is why you don't answer two questions with a one word answer! I have had quite enough of these one-word answers by the GDC. Not only is it unprofessional but it is not helpful. I would be surprised if they even read the post through until the end.
Never the less, I have asked them to clarify their response. Particularily in reference to <R34> and the NP18-12BFR batteries. I figure I'll be returning from our competition when I get a response...  |
This year the GDC has become incredibly cranky with their Q&A answers. The Q&A forum is supposed to clear up ambiguity in the rules. How are ambiguous answers supposed to clear up ambiguity? does anybody remember when they used to make jokes? Those were good times. I'm also seeing too many questions that include examples for the sake of clarity being ignored and given this response:
"The purpose of this forum is to answer questions on specific rules, not to perform design reviews for legality."