View Single Post
  #219   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-03-2011, 01:10
Steve_Alaniz Steve_Alaniz is offline
Registered User
FRC #2848 (All Sparks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Dallas
Posts: 211
Steve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Another Culture Change

Quote:
Originally Posted by robobandmom View Post

During the first rounds of the eliminations, there was a human player that appeared to be attempting to damage their bot, or at least get it to drop a tube. They were awarded a red card for this, and rightfully so.

Just a point of curiosity... I am not trying to argue but please consider this.
At the Alamo regional, a tube occasionally hung on a robot where it was not intended. When that happened, there was a penalty assessed on that robot if it also held a game piece. The rules state that you may only possess one game piece at a time. So much has been made over knowing the actual facts that I have to ask about the 1114 incident... was this an intentional act by a student to damage a robot or a tactic to cause that robot delay wile trying to dislodge the game piece? I'm not sure it is against the rules to hit a robot with a game piece but I would like to know if there is a specific prohibition to doing so. In any case... did the student admit he was trying to damage the robot or is that just a perception?


Steve